...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of knowledge management >Knowledge quality: antecedents and consequence in project teams
【24h】

Knowledge quality: antecedents and consequence in project teams

机译:知识素质:项目团队的前因和后果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to address the nature of knowledge quality, describe its dimensions, and create valid and reliable instruments to measure it. Knowledge quality is proposed as a second-order factor model which includes three dimensions: intrinsic knowledge quality, contextual knowledge quality, and actionable knowledge quality. This study also aims to examine important antecedents to and an outcome of knowledge quality. Design/methodology/approach - Data collected from 208 project teams were used to test measures of knowledge quality and to examine a proposed research framework by using LISREL for structural equation modeling. Findings - Results support the claim that knowledge quality has three dimensions. The results also show that functional diversity, absorptive capacity, and knowledge networks are critical antecedents that positively impact knowledge quality, which in turn has an influence on innovation. Research limitations/implications - The research framework enables academicians and practitioners to have important insights regarding the determinants of knowledge quality and its positive impact on innovation. Practical implications - The valid and reliable instruments of knowledge quality provide a tool to analyze the strengths and weaknesses of intrinsic, contextual, and actionable knowledge quality. This study illustrates how firms can improve knowledge quality by integrating interdisciplinary knowledge. Originality/values - This study identifies dimensions of knowledge quality and its antecedents and consequences.
机译:目的-这项研究的目的是解决知识质量的本质,描述知识的维度,并创建有效和可靠的工具来衡量知识质量。知识质量被提议为一个二阶因素模型,包括三个维度:内在知识质量,情境知识质量和可操作的知识质量。本研究还旨在检验知识质量的重要前提和结果。设计/方法/方法-从208个项目团队中收集的数据用于测试知识质量的度量,并通过使用LISREL进行结构方程建模来检验提议的研究框架。调查结果-结果证明知识质量具有三个维度。结果还表明,功能多样性,吸收能力和知识网络是对知识质量产生积极影响的关键先决条件,而知识质量反过来又对创新产生影响。研究的局限性/意义-研究框架使院士和从业人员可以对知识质量的决定因素及其对创新的积极影响有重要的见解。实际意义-知识质量的有效和可靠工具为分析内在,上下文和可操作的知识质量的优缺点提供了一种工具。这项研究说明了企业如何通过整合跨学科知识来提高知识质量。原创性/价值-这项研究确定了知识质量的维度,其前因和后果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号