首页> 外文期刊>Clinical nutrition >Comparison of a high-protein disease-specific enteral formula with a high-protein enteral formula in hyperglycemic critically ill patients.
【24h】

Comparison of a high-protein disease-specific enteral formula with a high-protein enteral formula in hyperglycemic critically ill patients.

机译:高血糖危重患者中高蛋白疾病特异性肠内配方与高蛋白肠内配方的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIMS: To determine whether a specific high-protein enteral formula with a similar caloric percentage of fat and carbohydrates achieves greater control over glycemic levels and reduces insulin requirements in hyperglycemic critically ill patients when compared to a control high-protein enteral formula.DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind trial in two University Hospital Intensive Care Units in Spain.METHODS: We enrolled 50 patients with diabetes mellitus or stress hyperglycemia with basal glycemia >/=160mg/dl and indication for enteral nutrition >/=5 days. Patients with severe kidney failure, liver failure or obesity were excluded from the study. In the first 48h of admission, after randomization, 26 patients received the study diet and 24 patients received the control diet. The variables were monitored for 14 days. The Harris-Benedict formula with a fixed stress factor of 1.2 was used to calculate caloric needs. Insulin was administered by continuous infusion. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed.RESULTS: On admission, there were no differences between the study and control group in plasma glucose levels (mg/dl) (190.9+/-45 vs 210.3+/-63) and capillary glucose levels (mg/dl) (226.1+/-73 vs 213.8+/-67). After the feeding trial, there were differences between the study and control group in plasma glucose levels (mg/dl) (176.8+/-44 vs 222.8+/-47, P=0.001), capillary glucose levels (mg/dl) (163.1+/-45 vs 216.4+/-56, P=0.001), insulin requirements/day (IU) 8.73 (2.3-27.5) vs 30.2 (21.5-57.1) (P=0.001), insulin/received carbohydrates (UI/g) 0.07 (0.02-0.22) vs 0.18 (0.11-0.35) (P=0.02) and insulin/received carbohydrates/kg 0.98 (0.26-3.59) vs 2.13 (1.44-4.58) (P=0.04). These differences remain in a day-to-day comparison. There were no differences in the analytical tests, or in digestive or infectious complications. Intensive Care Unit length of stay, mechanical ventilation and mortality were similar in both groups.CONCLUSIONS: Hyperglycemic critically ill patients fed with a high-protein diet with a similar caloric percentage of fat and carbohydrates show a significant reduction in plasma glucose levels, capillary glucose levels and insulin requirements in comparison to patients on a conventional high-protein diet. This better glycemic control do not modify Intensive Care Unit length of stay, infectious complications, mechanical ventilation and mortality.
机译:目的:确定与高蛋白肠溶对照品相比,具有高卡路里脂肪和碳水化合物含量的特定高蛋白肠溶配方食品是否能更好地控制血糖水平并降低高血糖危重患者的胰岛素需求。方法:我们在西班牙的两个大学医院重症监护室进行了一项前瞻性,随机,对照,单盲试验。方法:我们招募了50例糖尿病或应激性高血糖患者,其基础血糖> / = 160mg / dl,肠内营养指标> / = 5。天。具有严重肾衰竭,肝衰竭或肥胖症的患者被排除在研究之外。在入院的第一个48h中,随机分组后,有26名患者接受了研究饮食,有24位患者接受了对照饮食。监测变量14天。具有固定应力因子1.2的Harris-Benedict公式用于计算热量需求。通过连续输注给予胰岛素。结果:入院时,研究组与对照组的血浆葡萄糖水平(mg / dl)(190.9 +/- 45 vs 210.3 +/- 63)和毛细血管葡萄糖无差异浓度(mg / dl)(226.1 +/- 73对213.8 +/- 67)。喂养试验后,研究组与对照组之间的血浆葡萄糖水平(mg / dl)(176.8 +/- 44对222.8 +/- 47,P = 0.001),毛细血管葡萄糖水平(mg / dl)( 163.1 +/- 45 vs 216.4 +/- 56,P = 0.001),每天胰岛素需求量(IU)8.73(2.3-27.5)vs 30.2(21.5-57.1)(P = 0.001),胰岛素/接受碳水化合物(UI / g)0.07(0.02-0.22)与0.18(0.11-0.35)(P = 0.02)和胰岛素/接收碳水化合物/千克0.98(0.26-3.59)与2.13(1.44-4.58)(P = 0.04)。这些差异仍然存在于日常比较中。分析测试,消化或感染并发症没有差异。结论两组重症监护病房的住院时间,机械通气和死亡率相似。结论:高血糖重症患者接受高蛋白饮食,脂肪和碳水化合物的热量百分比相似,血浆葡萄糖水平,毛细血管葡萄糖水平显着降低与常规高蛋白饮食的患者相比,胰岛素水平和胰岛素需求量较高。这种更好的血糖控制不会改变重症监护病房的住院时间,感染并发症,机械通气和死亡率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号