首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hydrometeorology >Comparison of the GPCP 1DD Precipitation Product and NEXRAD Q2 Precipitation Estimates over the Continental United States
【24h】

Comparison of the GPCP 1DD Precipitation Product and NEXRAD Q2 Precipitation Estimates over the Continental United States

机译:美国大陆上GPCP 1DD降水量产品和NEXRAD Q2降水量估算值的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study compares the Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) 1 Degree Daily (1DD) precipitation estimates over the continental United States (CONUS) with National Mosaic and Multi-Sensor Quantitative Precipitation Estimation (NMQ) Next Generation (Q2) estimates. Spatial averages of monthly and yearly accumulated precipitation were computed based on daily estimates from six selected regions during the period 2010-12. Both Q2 and GPCP daily precipitation estimates show that precipitation amounts over southern regions (<40 degrees N) are generally larger than northern regions (>= 40 degrees N). Correlation coefficients for daily estimates over selected regions range from 0.355 to 0.516 with mean differences (GPCP - Q2) varying from -0.86 to 0.99 mm. Better agreements are found in monthly estimates with the correlations varying from 0.635 to 0.787. For spatially averaged precipitation values averaged from grid boxes within selected regions, GPCP and Q2 estimates are well correlated, especially for monthly accumulated precipitation, with strong correlations ranging from 0.903 to 0.954. The comparisons between two datasets are also conducted for warm (April-September) and cold (October-March) seasons. During the warm season, GPCP estimates are 9.7% less than Q2 estimates, while during the cold season GPCP estimates exceed Q2 estimates by 6.9%. For precipitation over the CONUS, although annual means are close (978.54 for Q2 vs 941.79 mm for GPCP), Q2 estimates are much larger than GPCP over the central and southern United States and less than GPCP estimates in the northeastern United States. These results suggest that Q2 may have difficulties accurately estimating heavy rain and snow events, while GPCP may have an inability to capture some intense precipitation events, which warrants further investigation.
机译:这项研究将美国大陆(CONUS)上的全球降水气候项目(GPCP)每日1度(1DD)降水估算与下一代美国国家镶嵌和多传感器定量降水估算(NMQ)估算进行了比较。根据2010-12年期间六个选定地区的每日估算值,计算出月度和年度累积降水量的空间平均值。第2季度和GPCP的每日降水量估计均显示,南部地区(<40°N)的降水量通常大于北部地区(> = 40°N)。选定区域每日估算的相关系数范围为0.355至0.516,平均差异(GPCP-Q2)为-0.86至0.99 mm。在每月估算中发现更好的协议,相关系数从0.635到0.787。对于从选定区域内的网格框求出的空间平均降水值,GPCP和Q2估计值具有良好的相关性,尤其是对于月累积降水量而言,相关性很强,范围为0.903至0.954。在暖季(4月至9月)和冷季(10月至3月)也进行了两个数据集之间的比较。在温暖的季节,GPCP的估算值比第二季度低9.7%,而在寒冷的季节,GPCP的估算值比第二季度高6.9%。就CONUS上的降水而言,尽管年度平均值接近(第二季度为978.54毫米,而GPCP为941.79毫米),但第二季度的估计值比美国中部和南部的GPCP大得多,而低于美国东北部的GPCP估计。这些结果表明,第2季度可能难以准确估计暴雨和降雪事件,而GPCP可能无法捕获某些强降水事件,因此有必要进行进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号