首页> 外文期刊>Journal of health politics, policy and law >Targets and systems of health care cost control (see comments)
【24h】

Targets and systems of health care cost control (see comments)

机译:卫生保健成本控制的目标和系统(请参阅评论)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Discussion of health care cost control policy and politics tends to focus on terms such as "market," "government," and "managed care" that are either too general or too value laden to encourage sound analysis. This article proposes an alternative framework for classifying cost control policies. It first distinguishes targets from systems of control. Targets can then be divided into categories of service (e.g., hospital care, pharmaceutical treatment) and components of cost (e.g., price and volume). Systems can be classified in terms of the degree of pooling of finance, ranging from no insurance to a single pool of funds, and how payment of providers is organized, ranging from all payers paying all providers on the same terms to extensive selective contracting among payers and providers. The article analyzes examples of target policy and politics, system policy and politics, and how system choices can influence which targets are targeted how well, so as to show that both policy consequences and political alignments become clearer by using these terms. As one instance, discussions of "managed care" are often confused because the term has two meanings, one referring to target policy and one to system policy.
机译:关于医疗保健成本控制政策和政治的讨论倾向于集中在诸如“市场”,“政府”和“管理式医疗”之类的术语上,这些术语过于笼统或太过沉重,无法鼓励进行合理的分析。本文提出了一个用于分类成本控制策略的替代框架。它首先将目标与控制系统区分开。然后可以将目标分为服务类别(例如,医院护理,药物治疗)和成本组成部分(例如,价格和数量)。可以根据资金的集合程度对系统进行分类,范围从无保险到单一资金池,以及如何组织提供者的付款,从所有付款人以相同的条件向所有提供者付款,到付款人之间广泛的选择性签约和提供商。本文分析了目标政策和政治,系统政策和政治的例子,以及系统选择如何影响目标对象的效果,以表明使用这些术语可以使政策后果和政治联盟变得更加清晰。作为一个实例,关于“管理式护理”的讨论常常被混淆,因为该术语具有两种含义,一种表示目标策略,一种表示系统策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号