...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of human nutrition and dietetics >Improving food purchasing choices through increased understanding of food labels, using itemized till receipts to measure these changes.
【24h】

Improving food purchasing choices through increased understanding of food labels, using itemized till receipts to measure these changes.

机译:通过加深对食品标签的了解,使用逐项收据来衡量这些变化,从而改善食品购买选择。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Rising obesity and the associated risks of diabetes and heart disease require changes in diet to bring about healthier eating. To achieve this, people need to understand nutrition and daily requirements but are frequently confused by nutrition information on food labels. The introduction of the Food Standards Agency's 'Traffic Light' and the alternative 'Guideline Daily Amount' systems may help or further confuse the public. A previous study showed that although 63% of study participants read labels, only 25% claimed to understand them, also knowledge of nutrient requirements and functions was low (Rigby, 2004). Ransley et al., (2001) have shown that till receipts can be used to estimate fat and energy intake. The aim of the current study was to investigate whether an intervention designed to improve understanding of nutrition and labels could improve food purchases and whether these changes could be measured from till receipts. Method: Participants were recruited from the general public (80 female; 23 males) (age <30 years (23), 31-45 years (25), 46-60 years (30), >60 years (22). Subjects were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (n = 78) who were provided with an information booklet and credit card sized nutrition and labelling information to use when shopping, or the control group (n = 25), who received the information after four weeks of normal shopping. The intervention group provided an initial till receipt pre intervention and was then given the nutrition and labelling material. Further till receipts were returned from successive shopping trips over the following 4 weeks. The nine categories of food used for comparison were: fruit and vegetables, saturated fats, monounsaturated fats, polyunsaturated fats, white cereals, wholegrain cereals, processed foods, full fat and reduced fat items. Ethics approval was obtained from NWW Wales NHS Trust ethics committee. Results: Each of the nine food categories on till receipts were calculated as a percentage of the total shopping, excluding non-food items. General linear model repeated measures analyses showed differences between study participants' food purchases. For the intervention group, purchases in three of the nine food categories showed significant improvements: increased purchases of fruits and vegetables (P < 0.001); reduction in purchases of saturated fats (P < 0.001); and reduction of white cereal purchases (P < 0.050). The control group showed no differences in any category. Discussion: Although the intervention group did show improvements in most of the other food categories, they were not statistically significant. Positive changes were found in seven of the nine categories, with only one, wholegrain cereals, showing a decrease in purchases rather than an increase. The control group displayed a random pattern over the four till receipts, with eight categories either showing negative change or no change; only one showed a positive change. The disproportionate group sizes may mean that it is not be possible to draw firm conclusions regarding the effectiveness of the intervention. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that positive changes in improving food-purchasing choices, as measured by till receipts, can be made by using educational interventions. Further larger studies using routinely collected supermarket data would enable the study to be replicated on a much larger scale. References Ransley, J.K., Donnelly, J.K., Khara, T.N., Botham, H., Arnott, H., Greenwood, D.C. & Cade, J.E. (1991) The use of supermarket till receipts to determine the fat and energy intake in a UK population. Public Health Nutr. 4, 1279-1286. Rigby, P. (2004) Effecting change. Understanding nutritional information. Can increased knowledge and understanding in relation to nutritional information bring about a change in eating habits? PhD Thesis WA: Bangor University.
机译:背景:肥胖症的上升以及与糖尿病和心脏病有关的风险,需要改变饮食以带来更健康的饮食。为此,人们需要了解营养和日常需求,但经常被食品标签上的营养信息所混淆。食品标准局的“交通灯”和替代性的“每日指导量”系统的引入可能会帮助或进一步混淆公众。先前的一项研究表明,尽管63%的研究参与者阅读了标签,但只有25%的人声称了解标签,但是对营养需求和功能的了解也很低(Rigby,2004年)。 Ransley等人(2001年)表明,直到收据可以用来估计脂肪和能量的摄入量。本研究的目的是调查旨在改善对营养和标签的理解的干预措施是否可以改善食品购买,以及这些变化是否可以一直测量到收据。方法:从普通公众中招募参与者(80名女性; 23名男性)(年龄<30岁(23岁),31-45岁(25岁),46-60岁(30岁),> 60岁(22岁)。随机分配给干预组(n = 78),他们被提供了要在购物时使用的信息手册和信用卡大小的营养和标签信息,或者随机分配给了对照组(n = 25),后者在接受治疗四周后收到了信息正常购物:干预组提供了一个从最初到收货的干预措施,然后提供了营养和标签材料,直到在接下来的4周中连续购物旅行返回收货为止,用于比较的9种食物是:水果和蔬菜,饱和脂肪,单不饱和脂肪,多不饱和脂肪,白色谷物,全麦谷物,加工食品,全脂和减脂食品。获得NWW威尔士NHS信托伦理委员会的伦理学批准。结果:九种食物中的每一种直到收据上的类别均占购物总额的百分比,不包括非食品类。一般线性模型重复测量分析显示,研究参与者的食品购买之间存在差异。对于干预组,九种食物中的三种的购买量显示出显着改善:水果和蔬菜的购买量增加(P <0.001);减少购买饱和脂肪(P <0.001);并减少了白色谷物的购买(P <0.050)。对照组在任何类别上均无差异。讨论:尽管干预组确实在其他大多数食品类别中均表现出改善,但在统计学上并不显着。在九个类别中的七个类别中发现了积极的变化,其中只有一种全麦谷物,表明购买量减少而不是增加。对照组在四个收货收据上显示一个随机模式,其中八个类别显示负变化或不变化;只有一个显示出积极的变化。小组人数不成比例可能意味着不可能就干预的有效性得出确切的结论。结论:这项研究表明,通过使用教育干预措施,可以改善按收货量衡量的食品购买选择方面的积极变化。使用常规收集的超市数据进行的进一步大型研究将使该研究能够大规模重复进行。参考文献Ransley,JK,Donnelly,JK,Khara,TN,Botham,H.,Arnott,H.,Greenwood,DC&Cade,JE(1991)使用超市直到收据确定英国人口的脂肪和能量摄入。公共卫生食品。 4,1279-1286。 Rigby,P.(2004)影响变化。了解营养信息。与营养信息相关的知识和理解的增加会带来饮食习惯的改变吗?华盛顿大学博士论文:班戈大学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号