...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hospital Medicine >Do hospitalists affect clinical outcomes and efficiency for patients with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH)?
【24h】

Do hospitalists affect clinical outcomes and efficiency for patients with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH)?

机译:住院医生是否会影响急性上消化道出血(UGIH)患者的临床结局和效率?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND:: Care by hospitalists has been associated with improved/similar clinical outcomes and efficiency. However, less is known about their effect on conditions dependent upon specialists for procedures/treatment plans. Our objective was to compare care for upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH) patients attended by academic hospitalists and nonhospitalists. METHODS:: The study included 450 UGIH patients admitted to general medical services of 6 teaching hospitals. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality and complications (ie, recurrent bleeding, intensive care unit [ICU] transfer, decompensation, transfusion, reendoscopy, 30-day readmission). Efficiency was measured by hospital costs and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS:: Of 450 patients, 40% (177) were cared for by hospitalists with no differences between groups by endoscopic diagnosis, performance of early esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), Rockall risk score, or Charlson comorbidity index. Unadjusted clinical outcomes between hospitalists and nonhospitalists were similar except for 2 outcomes: patients cared for by hospitalists were more likely to receive a transfusion (74% vs. 63%; P = 0.02) or be readmitted within 30 days (7.3% vs. 3.3%; P = 0.05). However, differences in adverse outcomes between providers were not seen after multivariable adjustments. Median LOS was similar for hospitalists and nonhospitalists (4 days; P = 0.69), but patients cared for by hospitalists had higher median costs (Dollars 7,359 vs. Dollars 6,181; P < 0.01). In multivariable analyses, LOS was similar (5.2 vs. 4.7 days; P = 0.15) and costs remained higher for the hospitalist-led teams (P < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS:: Despite having similar overall outcomes and LOS, costs were higher in UGIH patients attended by hospitalists. These results suggest that the academic hospitalist model may be tempered in patients requiring specialists for procedures or management. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2010;5:133-139. (c) 2010 Society of Hospital Medicine.
机译:背景:住院医生的护理与改善/相似的临床结果和效率相关。然而,关于它们对取决于专家的程序/治疗计划的条件的影响知之甚少。我们的目的是比较学术住院医师和非医院住院医师对上消化道出血(UGIH)患者的护理。方法:该研究包括6所教学医院的450名接受普通医疗服务的UGIH患者。结果包括院内死亡率和并发症(即反复出血,重症监护病房(ICU)转移,代偿失调,输血,再内镜检查,30天再入院)。效率通过医院成本和住院时间(LOS)来衡量。结果:在450例患者中,有40%(177)由内科镜检,早期食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)的表现,Rockall风险评分或Charlson合并症指数的住院医生所护理,两组之间无差异。住院医生和非医院医生之间未经调整的临床结局相似,除了两项结局相似:由住院医生照料的患者更有可能接受输血(74%比63%; P = 0.02)或在30天内被再次接纳(7.3%比3.3)。 %; P = 0.05)。但是,经过多变量调整后,提供者之间的不良结局没有差异。住院医师和非医院住院医师的中位服务水平相似(4天; P = 0.69),但由住院医师照料的患者的中位费用较高(美元7,359比美元6,181; P <0.01)。在多变量分析中,LOS相似(5.2天与4.7天; P = 0.15),并且由医院领导的团队的费用仍然较高(P <0.03)。结论:尽管总体结局和LOS相似,但在医院就诊的UGIH患者中费用较高。这些结果表明,对于需要专家进行程序或管理的患者,可以改善学术住院医生模型。医院医学杂志2010; 5:133-139。 (c)2010年医院医学学会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号