首页> 外文期刊>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth: JGR >Validity of the thin viscous sheet approximation in models of continental collision
【24h】

Validity of the thin viscous sheet approximation in models of continental collision

机译:薄板粘性近似在大陆碰撞模型中的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The two-dimensional thin viscous sheet approximation is widely used to describe large-scale continental deformation. It treats the lithosphere as a fluid layer in which deformation results from a balance between buoyancy forces and tectonic boundary conditions. Comparisons between two-dimensional thin sheet and full three-dimensional solutions of a simple indenter model show that appreciable differences exist, especially when the indenter half width, D, is of the same order as the thickness of the deforming layer, L (i.e., D/L= 1). These differences are amplified by increasing the power law exponent of the viscous constitutive law (n) but decrease as the Argand number (Ar) is increased. The greatest differences between two-dimensional and three-dimensional solutions are found at the indenter corner, where the thin sheet consistently overestimates vertical strain rates. Differences between strain rates at the corner may be 50% or greater for small Argand numbers. Other differences arise because a lithospheric root zone is formed in the three-dimensional solutions and vertically averaged strain rate is decreased in regions close to the indenter. This effect is absent from thin sheet calculations since the thickness of the load-bearing layer is assumed constant. In general, the thin viscous sheet approximation provides a reasonably accurate estimate of long wavelength deformation for D/L as low as 1 if n is less than —3. However, even at large D/L the solutions may be inaccurate close to strain rate concentrations at the indenter corners where horizontal gradients of deformation are large.
机译:二维薄粘性薄片近似被广泛用于描述大规模的大陆变形。它将岩石圈视为流体层,其中浮力和构造边界条件之间的平衡导致变形。简单压头模型的二维薄片和完整三维解决方案之间的比较表明,存在明显的差异,尤其是当压头的半宽度D与变形层的厚度L(即, D / L = 1)。这些差异通过增加粘性本构律(n)的幂律指数而被放大,但是随着Argand数(Ar)的增加而减小。二维和三维解决方案之间的最大差异是在压头角处发现的,该处的薄板始终高估了垂直应变率。对于较小的Argand数,拐角处的应变率之间的差异可能为50%或更大。之所以会出现其他差异,是因为在三维解中形成了岩石圈根部区域,并且在压头附近区域的垂直平均应变率降低了。由于假定承重层的厚度恒定,因此在薄板计算中没有这种效果。通常,如果n小于-3,则薄的粘性薄片近似值可提供D / L低至1的长波长变形的合理准确估计。但是,即使在较大的D / L下,在变形水平梯度大的压头角处,应变率浓度附近的溶液也可能不准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号