首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geophysical Research, D. Atmospheres: JGR >First versus subsequent return-stroke current and field peaks in negative cloud-to-ground lightning discharges
【24h】

First versus subsequent return-stroke current and field peaks in negative cloud-to-ground lightning discharges

机译:负云对地雷电放电中的第一个和随后的回程电流和场峰值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We examine relative magnitudes of electric field peaks of first and subsequent return strokes in negative cloud-to-ground lightning flashes recorded in Florida, Austria, Brazil, and Sweden. On average, the electric field peak of the first stroke is appreciably, 1.7 to 2.4 times, larger than the field peak of the subsequent stroke (except for studies in Austria where the ratio varies from 1.0 to 2.3, depending on methodology and instrumentation). Similar results were previously reported from electric field studies in Florida, Sweden, and Sri Lanka. For comparison, directly measured peak currents for first strokes are, on average, a factor of 2.3 to 2.5 larger than those for subsequent strokes. There are some discrepancies between first versus subsequent stroke intensities reported from different studies based on data reported by lightning locating systems (LLS). The ratio of LLS-reported peak currents for first and subsequent strokes confirmed by video records is 1.7 to 2.1 in Brazil, while in the United States (Arizona, Texas, Oklahoma, and the Great Plains) it varies from 1.1 to 1.6, depending on methodology used. The smaller ratios derived from the LLS studies are likely to be due to poor detection of relatively small subsequent strokes. The smaller values in Austria are possibly related (at least in part) to the higher percentage (about 50% versus 24–38% in other studies) of flashes with at least one subsequent stroke greater than the first. The effects of excluding single-stroke flashes or subsequent strokes in newly formed channels appear to be relatively small.
机译:我们检查了佛罗里达州,奥地利,巴西和瑞典记录的负云对地闪电中第一个和后续返回冲程的电场峰值的相对大小。平均而言,第一个冲程的电场峰值大约是后一个冲程的电场峰值的1.7到2.4倍(奥地利的研究除外,比率在1.0到2.3之间变化,这取决于方法和仪器)。以前在佛罗里达,瑞典和斯里兰卡进行的电场研究也报道了类似的结果。为了进行比较,直接测量的第一个冲程的峰值电流平均要比后续冲程的峰值电流大2.3到2.5倍。根据雷电定位系统(LLS)报告的数据,不同研究报告的第一和第二次中风强度之间存在差异。视频记录确认的第一笔和第二笔笔录的LLS报告的峰值电流比率在巴西为1.7到2.1,而在美国(亚利桑那州,德克萨斯州,俄克拉荷马州和大平原),则为1.1到1.6,具体取决于使用的方法。从LLS研究得出的较小比率可能是由于对较小的后续卒中的检测不良所致。在奥地利,较小的值可能与(至少部分地)与较高百分比的闪烁(至少50%相对于其他研究中的24-38%)有关,且随后的笔划至少比第一个大。在新形成的通道中排除单笔划闪光或后续笔划的影响似乎相对较小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号