...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geophysical Research, D. Atmospheres: JGR >Why do oceanic negative cloud-to-ground lightning exhibit larger peak current values?
【24h】

Why do oceanic negative cloud-to-ground lightning exhibit larger peak current values?

机译:为什么海洋负向云对地闪电会显示出更大的峰值电流值?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study examines the temporal (monthly) and spatial climatology (2004–2010) of the first return stroke of the cloud-to-ground (CG) lightning flash peak current (I_p) across various land/water boundaries over the contiguous United States. Four regions are examined: the Gulf of Mexico (region 1), the Florida peninsula (region 2), Lake Michigan (region 3), and part of the U.S. Mid-Atlantic (region 4). The cross sections across the coastlines of regions 1, 2, and 4 show a gradual oceanward increase in the mean negative polarity CG peak current values (-I_p). This transition along the respective land/ocean boundaries is not sharp but gradual. In direct contrast with ocean, there is no consistent behavior in -I_p values as we move from land out across the fresh water of Lake Michigan (region 3). Meanwhile, the positive CG flash peak current (+I_p) values do not exhibit a consistent variation across any coastal boundary. For region 1, the -I_p values increase as we move toward the coast (southwards) especially during the wet season (June–October). This finding is in direct contrast with studies that documented winter as the season of maximum -I_p values. The zonal and seasonal variations of -I_p values across region 4 are not quite as pronounced, but the oceanic -I_p values are still larger than over the adjoining landmass. We explore in turn which up to date hypotheses pertinent to the oceanic -I_p enhancement are supported or refuted by our findings. It is concluded that the oceanic -I_p enhancement is not an artifact related to CG detection or Ip retrieval methods, nor is it likely related to the cloud top heights or CG activity. The study cannot refute the role of electrical conductivity and its contribution to CG leader attachment processes. However, given the observed “blurred transition” of the I_p values across the coastlines this paper suggests that likely the main physical mechanism is acting on the thundercloud potential. The recently suggested role of sodium chloride (NaCl) but also the role of ice crystal size (implicated herein), as possible modulators of the thundercloud potential, exhibit distinct pros and cons. Their candidacy is supported by their strong physical links to the electrostatic charging and thundercloud electric potential buildup but also by the exhibited blurred -I_p transition across the coastlines. In contrast, the suggested mechanisms cannot individually explain the observed -I_p enhancement in terms of season, NaCl concentrations, and absence of similar behavior in the respective +I_p values.
机译:这项研究研究了跨美国各地陆/水边界上的云对地(CG)闪电峰值电流(I_p)的第一个回程的时间(每月)和空间气候(2004-2010)。检查了四个区域:墨西哥湾(区域1),佛罗里达半岛(区域2),密歇根湖(区域3)和美国中大西洋的一部分(区域4)。区域1、2和4的海岸线上的横截面显示,平均负极性CG峰值电流值(-I_p)向海洋逐渐增加。沿着各自陆地/海洋边界的这种过渡不是尖锐的而是渐进的。与海洋形成直接对比的是,当我们从陆地上越过密歇根湖的淡水(区域3)时,-I_p值没有一致的行为。同时,正CG闪烁峰值电流(+ I_p)值在任何沿海边界都没有表现出一致的变化。对于区域1,-I_p值随着我们向海岸(向南)移动而增加,尤其是在雨季(6月至10月)期间。这一发现与记录冬天为最大-I_p值季节的研究形成鲜明对比。跨区域4的-I_p值的纬向和季节变化不太明显,但是海洋的-I_p值仍大于相邻大陆上的-I_p值。我们依次探讨了与我们的发现支持或反驳的有关海洋-I_p增强的最新假设。可以得出结论,海洋的-I_p增强不是与CG检测或Ip检索方法有关的伪影,也不可能与云顶高度或CG活动有关。该研究不能反驳电导率的作用及其对CG导引连接过程的贡献。但是,鉴于观察到的跨海岸线I_p值的“模糊过渡”,本文表明,可能的主要物理机制是作用于雷云电势。最近建议的氯化钠(NaCl)的作用,以及冰晶尺寸的作用(此处暗示),作为雷云电势的可能调节剂,表现出明显的优缺点。它们与静电荷和雷云电势的建立之间有着紧密的物理联系,但海岸线上表现出的模糊的-I_p过渡也为它们的候选资格提供了支持。相反,建议的机制不能单独解释季节,NaCl浓度和在各个+ I_p值中没有相似行为方面的-I_p增强。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号