...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology >Endoscopic band ligation plus argon plasma coagulation versus scleroligation for eradication of esophageal varices.
【24h】

Endoscopic band ligation plus argon plasma coagulation versus scleroligation for eradication of esophageal varices.

机译:内镜下结扎加氩血浆凝结与硬化结扎可根除食管静脉曲张。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate endoscopic band ligation plus argon plasma coagulation versus scleroligation. METHODS: Patients were randomized to: Group I, 50 patients subjected to endoscopic injection sclerotherapy; Group II, 50 patients subjected to variceal band ligation; Group III, 50 patients subjected to combined endoscopic sclerotherapy and band ligation; and Group IV, 50 patients subjected to endoscopic band ligation plus argon plasma coagulation. RESULTS: A comparison of the number of therapeutic sessions showed that group III underwent significantly fewer sessions. As regards post-treatment complications, Group I showed a high incidence of transient pyrexia, transient dysphagia and/or retrosternal pain and ulceration, while in group II a higher incidence of rebleeding was demonstrated, as well as a higher incidence of esophageal varix recurrence after eradication during the follow-up period. A higher mortality incidence was detected in groups I and II. The follow-up incidence did not significantly differ between the different study groups. CONCLUSION: Scleroligation allows very rapid eradication of varices, has a low recurrence rate, avoids the disadvantage of high recurrence of band ligation alone, and does not require special skills over sclerotherapy or band ligation. Also, band ligation plus argon plasma coagulation allows for very rapid eradication of varices, and a low recurrence rate, with no obvious recorded complications, but it has the disadvantage of being the most expensive technique and requires special equipment that is only available in a few endoscopic centers.
机译:背景与目的:这项研究的目的是评估内镜带结扎加氩血浆凝结与硬化结扎。方法:将患者随机分为:I组,50例接受内镜硬化注射治疗;第二组:50例行曲张静脉结扎术;第三组:50例患者接受内窥镜硬化治疗和绑扎联合治疗; IV组,对50例行内镜下结扎加氩气血浆凝结治疗的患者。结果:治疗次数的比较表明,第三组的治疗次数明显减少。关于治疗后并发症,第一组显示短暂性发热,短暂性吞咽困难和/或胸骨后疼痛和溃疡的发生率较高,而第二组显示更高的再出血发生率,以及术后食管静脉曲张复发的发生率较高。在后续期间根除。在第一和第二组中发现较高的死亡率。不同研究组之间的随访发生率无显着差异。结论:硬化结扎术可以非常快速地根除静脉曲张,复发率低,避免了单纯结扎术高复发率的缺点,并且不需要硬化治疗或结扎术的特殊技能。同样,带结扎加上氩气等离子体凝结可以非常迅速地根除静脉曲张,并且复发率低,没有明显的并发症记录,但是它的缺点是最昂贵的技术,并且仅需要少数设备才能使用内窥镜中心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号