【24h】

Triceps surae stretch and voluntary contraction alters maximal M-wave magnitude

机译:肱三头肌拉伸和自发性收缩改变最大M波幅度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Reliability of the motor response (M-wave) is fundamental in many reflex studies; however it has recently been shown to change during some investigations. The aim of this investigation was to determine if triceps surae stretch and voluntary contraction, or recording and analysis techniques, affect the maximal M-wave magnitude. The maximal M-wave was investigated in human gastrocnemius and soleus during different foot positions and during triceps surae contraction. Both bipolar and monopolar-recoding methods, and area and peak-to-peak (PTP) amplitude analysis methods were used. Results: Maximal M-wave magnitude changed significantly between test muscle conditions, and is largest during dorsiflexion, probably due to changes in muscle bulk and recording electrode relationship. The maximal M-wave was up to 88% smaller when recorded by bipolar electrodes compared to monopolar electrodes, which is discussed in relation to signal cancellation. Area analysis provided more significant differences in M-wave magnitude between test muscle conditions than did PTP amplitude analysis, and the maximal M-wave shape changed significantly between test muscle conditions. This study suggests that maximal M-wave magnitude can vary depending on muscle condition, it highlights the importance of using correct recording and analysis techniques, and questions the reliability of using M-wave magnitude to monitor the relationship between the nerves and stimulating electrodes. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在许多反射研究中,运动反应(M波)的可靠性至关重要。但是最近发现在某些调查中它会发生变化。这项研究的目的是确定肱三头肌肱三头肌拉伸和自主收缩,或记录和分析技术,是否影响最大的M波幅度。在不同的足部位置和肱三头肌肱三头肌收缩过程中,研究了人类腓肠肌和比目鱼肌的最大M波。使用了双极和单极编码方法,以及面积和峰峰值(PTP)幅度分析方法。结果:最大M波强度在测试肌肉状况之间发生了显着变化,并且在背屈期间最大,可能是由于肌肉体积的变化和记录电极的关系所致。与单极电极相比,双极电极记录的最大M波减小了88%。与PTP幅度分析相比,面积分析在测试肌肉条件之间提供了更显着的M波幅值差异,并且最大M波形在测试肌肉条件之间显着变化。这项研究表明,最大的M波幅值可能会根据肌肉状况而变化,这凸显了使用正确的记录和分析技术的重要性,并质疑了使用M波幅值来监测神经与刺激电极之间关系的可靠性。 (c)2006 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号