首页> 外文期刊>Journal of forensic sciences. >Validation of tool mark analysis of cut costal cartilage
【24h】

Validation of tool mark analysis of cut costal cartilage

机译:切开肋软骨工具标记分析的验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study was designed to establish the potential error rate associated with the generally accepted method of tool mark analysis of cut marks in costal cartilage. Three knives with different blade types were used to make experimental cut marks in costal cartilage of pigs. Each cut surface was cast, and each cast was examined by three analysts working independently. The presence of striations, regularity of striations, and presence of a primary and secondary striation pattern were recorded for each cast. The distance between each striation was measured. The results showed that striations were not consistently impressed on the cut surface by the blade's cutting edge. Also, blade type classification by the presence or absence of striations led to a 65% misclassification rate. Use of the classification tree and cross-validation methods and inclusion of the mean interstriation distance decreased the error rate to c. 50%.
机译:这项研究旨在建立潜在误差率,该误差率与公认的肋软骨切痕的工具标记分析方法有关。使用三把不同刀片类型的刀在猪的肋软骨上做实验性切口。每个切割表面都是铸造的,每个铸造都由三名独立工作的分析师进行检查。记录每个演员的条纹的存在,条纹的规律性以及主要和次要的条纹图案的存在。测量每个条纹之间的距离。结果表明,锯条的刀刃未将条纹均匀地印在切割面上。同样,根据是否存在条纹,叶片类型分类导致错误分类率达到65%。使用分类树和交叉验证方法以及包含平均插入距离可将错误率降低至c。 50%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号