首页> 外文期刊>Journal of geriatric oncology >Tolerability and efficacy of docetaxel in older men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the TAX 327 trial
【24h】

Tolerability and efficacy of docetaxel in older men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the TAX 327 trial

机译:TAX 327试验中多西他赛对转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)的老年男性的耐受性和疗效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: Prostate cancer is a disease of older men. Weekly docetaxel (DPq1w) is often favored over the standard three-weekly regimen (DPq3w) due to concerns about safety and tolerability in this population. Materials and Methods: Two subgroup analyses of TAX 327 were conducted. Among patients receiving DPq3w, tolerability and efficacy were compared between three age groups: < 65, 65-74 and ≥ 75. years. For men ≥ 75. years, these outcomes were compared between DPq3w, DPq1w, and mitoxantrone (MP) arms. Tolerability outcomes included dose delivery, grade 3/4 adverse events and quality of life. Efficacy outcomes included overall survival and tumor response. Results: Of 1006 men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the trial, 335 received DPq3w. Among these, 20% were age ≥ 75. years. For DPq3w, there were non-significant associations of worse tolerability and efficacy with advancing age. Twenty-eight percent of men age ≥ 75. years had an objective pain response, compared to 38% and 34% of patients 65-74 and < 65. years, respectively. There were no significant differences in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (43-48%, p = 0.74) or measurable tumor response (7-17%, p = 0.30) according to age. Among men ≥ 75. years, DPq3w resulted in more dose reductions than DPq1w (22% versus 8%, p = 0.007), but tolerability was otherwise comparable. Both were associated with more favorable efficacy than mitoxantrone. Conclusions: Tolerability and efficacy of DPq3w appear less favorable with advancing age. Compared to DPq1w, DPq3w is associated with better survival outcomes, but similar tolerability, and remains the standard first-line chemotherapy option in mCRPC. Toxicity is substantial, therefore careful patient selection, close monitoring and early management of toxicities is advised.
机译:目的:前列腺癌是老年男性的疾病。由于担心该人群的安全性和耐受性,每周多西他赛(DPq1w)优于标准的每周三周治疗方案(DPq3w)。材料和方法:进行了TAX 327的两个亚组分析。在接受DPq3w的患者中,比较了以下三个年龄组的耐受性和疗效:<65、65-74和≥75.岁。对于≥75岁的男性,比较了DPq3w,DPq1w和米托蒽醌(MP)组的这些结局。耐受性结果包括剂量给药,3/4级不良事件和生活质量。疗效结果包括总体生存率和肿瘤反应。结果:在该试验的1006例患有转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)的男性中,有335例接受了DPq3w治疗。其中,年龄≥75岁的占20%。对于DPq3w,耐受性和功效与年龄的增长之间存在显着的相关性。年龄≥75.岁的男性中有28%有客观的疼痛反应,而65-74岁和<65.岁的男性分别为38%和34%。根据年龄,前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)反应(43-48%,p = 0.74)或可测量的肿瘤反应(7-17%,p = 0.30)没有显着差异。 ≥75岁的男性中,DPq3w的剂量减少量大于DPq1w(22%对8%,p = 0.007),但耐受性在其他方面可比。两者均比米托蒽醌具有更好的疗效。结论:随着年龄的增长,DPq3w的耐受性和疗效似乎较差。与DPq1w相比,DPq3w具有更好的生存结果,但耐受性相似,并且仍然是mCRPC的标准一线化疗方案。毒性很大,因此建议仔细选择患者,密切监测和早期处理毒性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号