首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Forecasting >Forecasting commodity prices: GARCH, jumps, and mean reversion
【24h】

Forecasting commodity prices: GARCH, jumps, and mean reversion

机译:预测商品价格:GARCH,跳跃和均值回归

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In examining stochastic models for commodity prices, central questions often revolve around time-varying trend, stochastic convenience yield and volatility, and mean reversion. This paper seeks to assess and compare alternative approaches to modelling these effects, with focus on forecast performance. Three specifications are considered: (i) random-walk models with GARCH and normal or Student-t innovations; (ii) Poisson-based jump-diffusion models with GARCH and normal or Student-t innovations; and (iii) mean-reverting models that allow for uncertainty in equilibrium price. Our empirical application makes use of aluminium spot and futures price series at daily and weekly frequencies. Results show: (i) models with stochastic convenience yield outperform all other competing models, and for all forecast horizons; (ii) the use of futures prices does not always yield lower forecast error values compared to the use of spot prices; and (iii) within the class of (G)ARCH random-walk models, no model uniformly dominates the other. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:在研究商品价格的随机模型时,中心问题通常围绕时变趋势,随机便利收益率和波动率以及均值回归展开。本文旨在评估和比较建模这些效果的替代方法,重点放在预测性能上。考虑了三个规范:(i)具有GARCH和常规或Student-t创新的随机游走模型; (ii)带有GARCH和常规或Student-t创新的基于泊松的跳跃扩散模型; (iii)均值回归模型,该模型考虑了均衡价格的不确定性。我们的经验应用利用每日和每周的铝现货和期货价格序列。结果表明:(i)具有随机便利性的模型在所有预测范围内均优于所有其他竞争模型; (ii)与使用现货价格相比,使用期货价格并不总是产生较低的预测误差值; (iii)在(G)ARCH随机游走模型类别中,没有一个模型能够统一地主导另一个模型。版权所有(C)2008 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号