首页> 外文期刊>Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition >The Origins of Individual Differences in How Learning Is Expressed in Rats: A General-Process Perspective
【24h】

The Origins of Individual Differences in How Learning Is Expressed in Rats: A General-Process Perspective

机译:在大鼠中学习表达方式的个体差异的起源:全过程视角

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Laboratory rats can exhibit marked, qualitative individual differences in the form of acquired behaviors. For example, when exposed to a signal-reinforcer relationship some rats show marked and consistent changes in sign-tracking (interacting with the signal; e.g., a lever) and others show marked and consistent changes in goal-tracking (interacting with the location of the predicted reinforcer; e.g.,the food well). Here, stable individual differences in rats' sign-tracking and goal-tracking emerged over the course of training, but these differences did not generalize across different signal-reinforcer relationships (Experiment 1). This selectivity suggests that individual differences in sign- and goal-tracking reflect differences in the value placed on individual reinforcers. Two findings provide direct support for this interpretation: the palatability of a reinforcer (as measured by an analysis of lick-cluster size) was positively correlated with goal-tracking (and negatively correlated with sign-tracking); and sating rats with a reinforcer affected goal-tracking but not sign-tracking (Experiment 2). These results indicate that the observed individual differences in sign- and goal-tracking behavior arise from the interaction between the palatability or value of the reinforcer and processes of association as opposed to dispositional differences (e.g., in sensory processes, “temperament," or response repertoire).
机译:实验大鼠可以表现出明显的,定性的个体差异,形式为后天行为。例如,当暴露于信号增强器关系时,一些大鼠在符号跟踪中显示出明显且一致的变化(与信号交互;例如,杠杆),而另一些大鼠在目标跟踪中显示出明显且一致的变化(与目标位置交互)预计的补强剂;例如食物井)。在此过程中,在训练过程中出现了大鼠符号追踪和目标追踪的稳定个体差异,但这些差异并未在不同的信号增强剂关系中普遍存在(实验1)。这种选择性表明,符号跟踪和目标跟踪的个体差异反映了单个增强子的价值差异。有两个发现为这种解释提供了直接的支持:增强剂的适口性(通过对舔群大小的分析来衡量)与目标追踪成正相关(与符号追踪成负相关);并用增强剂使大鼠饱食受目标跟踪而不是符号跟踪的影响(实验2)。这些结果表明,观察到的符号和目标追踪行为的个体差异是由增强者的适口性或价值与交往过程之间的相互作用引起的,而不是与处置差异(例如,在感觉过程,“气质”或反应中)产生的相互作用而产生的。曲目)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号