...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Essential Oil Research >Comparison of microwave-assisted hydrodistillation and solvent-less microwave extraction of essential oil from dry and fresh Citruslimon (Eureka variety) peel
【24h】

Comparison of microwave-assisted hydrodistillation and solvent-less microwave extraction of essential oil from dry and fresh Citruslimon (Eureka variety) peel

机译:干燥和新鲜柑桔(尤里卡品种)皮的微波辅助加氢蒸馏和无溶剂微波萃取精油的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study investigated the effectiveness of microwave-assisted hydrodistillation (MAHD) and solvent-less microwave extraction (SLME) for extracting essential oil (EO) from lemon peels in comparison with conventional hydrodistillation (HD) in terms of extraction time, extraction yield, physical properties, chemical composition, operation cost, and antioxidant activity. The results showed that MAHD and SLME methods required an extraction time of 15 minutes while the required extraction time in HD was 120 minutes. There were no significant differences among physical properties (refractive index, specific gravity, and color) of extracted EOs by the three methods. Gas chromatography analysis did not indicate any noticeable change in the composition of EOs extracted by microwave-assisted extraction methods (MAHD and SLME) and HD method. DPPHo analysis of the extracted EOs indicated that microwave irradiation did not adversely influence antioxidant activity of the extracted EOs. The results of this study introduced MAHD and SLME as rapid, economical, and environmentally friendly extraction methods.
机译:这项研究研究了微波辅助加氢蒸馏(MAHD)和无溶剂微波萃取(SLME)从柠檬皮中提取香精油(EO)与常规加氢蒸馏(HD)相比在萃取时间,萃取产率,物理性能方面的有效性。性能,化学成分,运营成本和抗氧化活性。结果表明,MAHD和SLME方法需要15分钟的提取时间,而HD中所需的提取时间是120分钟。三种方法提取的EO的物理性质(折射率,比重和颜色)之间没有显着差异。气相色谱分析未显示通过微波辅助萃取方法(MAHD和SLME)和HD方法萃取的EO的组成有任何明显变化。萃取的EO的DPPHo分析表明,微波辐射对萃取的EO的抗氧化活性没有不利影响。这项研究的结果介绍了MAHD和SLME作为快速,经济和环保的提取方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号