首页> 外文期刊>Journal of evolutionary biology >Analysis of range expansion in two species undergoing character displacement: why might invaders generally 'win' during character displacement?
【24h】

Analysis of range expansion in two species undergoing character displacement: why might invaders generally 'win' during character displacement?

机译:分析两个经历角色置换的物种的范围扩展:为什么在角色置换期间入侵者通常会“获胜”?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Ecological character displacement occurs when interacting species diverge in resource use and associated traits in response to selection to minimize resource competition between them. Yet, when resource quality is asymmetric, the species that monopolizes the more profitable resource following character displacement may have higher fitness and therefore be deemed the 'winner'. Here, we ask: does the winner tend to be the resident species (i.e. the earlier inhabitant of the geographic region where character displacement occurred) or the invader (i.e. the subsequent inhabitant of the region)? We focus on two spadefoot toad species that have undergone character displacement. Previous studies revealed that Spea bombifrons gains the higher quality resource following character displacement; consequently, Spea multiplicata must use the lower quality resource, and as a result, experiences negative fitness consequences. Where the two species have undergone character displacement, three lines of evidence implicate S. bombifrons as the invader: S. bombifrons possess lower haplotype and nucleotide diversity; they do not exhibit isolation by distance (in contrast to S. multiplicata); and they display much higher population growth rates. We hypothesize that historical patterns of selection in its ancestral range pre-adapted S. bombifrons to evolve phenotypes capable of monopolizing the superior resource. Generally, because superior competitive abilities may facilitate successful invasions, invaders may be well positioned to win during character displacement.
机译:当相互作用的物种因选择而在资源使用和相关性状上有所不同时,就会发生生态特征置换,从而最大程度地减少物种之间的资源竞争。但是,当资源质量不对称时,在角色转移后垄断了更有利可图资源的物种可能具有更高的适应性,因此被视为“赢家”。在这里,我们问:获胜者倾向于是居民物种(即发生角色置换的地理区域的较早居民)还是入侵者(即该区域的后继居民)?我们专注于两个经历过性格置换的黑脚蟾蜍物种。先前的研究表明,Spea bombifrons在角色置换后获得了更高质量的资源。因此,倍增豌豆必须使用质量较低的资源,结果会带来不利的适应性后果。如果这两个物种已发生性状转移,则三行证据暗示S. bombifrons是入侵者:S. bombifrons具有较低的单倍型和核苷酸多样性;它们没有表现出距离隔离(与倍增链球菌相反);而且他们的人口增长率更高。我们假设在其祖先范围内进行选择的历史模式预先适应了S. bombifrons,使其进化出能够垄断优势资源的表型。通常,由于出色的竞争能力可以促进成功的入侵,因此入侵者可能会在角色转移期间处于有利位置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号