...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Planning and Management >Role of wild game in the diet of recreationists in South Carolina
【24h】

Role of wild game in the diet of recreationists in South Carolina

机译:野生动物在南卡罗来纳州休闲饮食中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Risk assessors have devoted considerable attention to the consumption of fish in the diet of recreational and subsistence anglers, but little attention has been directed toward the percentage that wild game contributes to total protein intake for people who engage in hunting and fishing. While recall studies have limitations, the relative errors should be similar for different types of fish and game. We interviewed 454 people attending the Palmetto Sportsmen's Classic in South Carolina to determine their consumption patterns of domesticated animals, fish (both wild-caught and commercial) and wild game. The percentage of people who consumed each type of meat was: chicken (98%); beef (95%); wild-caught fish (79%); deer (79%); restaurant fish (73%); pork (71%); dove (47%); commercial fish (41%); wild turkey (40%), duck, squirrel and self-caught quail (about 25% each); restaurant quail (10%); and raccoon (11%). Although a similar proportion of white respondents and black respondents consumed wild game overall (90%), there were ethnic differences in the number of meals of wild-caught fish and game. Black respondents ate more wild-caught fish, rabbit, raccoon and squirrel, and less deer, than did white respondents. Wild-caught fish and game made up 50% of the meat and fish diet of black sportsmen, but only 32% for whites. Wild-caught fish and game were being eaten disproportionately more by low-income black respondents, while more deer was consumed by higher-income black respondents. The data suggest that managers and planners should take into account age, ethnicity and income when (1) conducting exposure assessments, (2) considering consumption patterns for wild-caught fish and game and (3) managing risk from wild-caught fish and game. The data will be especially useful to policy makers and risk managers who are designing consumption advisories, for risk communicators in identifying the target audience and for managers designing long-term stewardship for sites with contamination.
机译:风险评估人员对休闲和自给钓鱼者饮食中的鱼类消费给予了极大的关注,但很少有人关注野生猎物占从事狩猎和捕鱼的人蛋白质总摄入量的百分比。尽管召回研究有局限性,但不同类型的鱼类和野味的相对误差应相似。我们采访了南卡罗来纳州参加Palmetto运动员经典赛的454人,以确定他们对驯养动物,鱼类(野生捕捞和商业捕捞)和野生猎物的消费方式。食用每种肉类的人口百分比是:鸡肉(98%);牛肉(95%);野鱼(79%);鹿(79%);餐厅鱼(73%);猪肉(71%);鸽子(47%);商业鱼(41%);野火鸡(40%),鸭,松鼠和自捕鹌鹑(每只约25%);餐厅鹌鹑(10%);和浣熊(11%)。尽管白人受访者和黑人受访者总体上使用野生猎物的比例相似(90%),但野生捕捞鱼和野味的进餐数量存在种族差异。与白人受访者相比,黑人受访者吃的野鱼,兔子,浣熊和松鼠多,鹿少。野鱼和野味占黑人运动员肉和鱼饮食的50%,而白人仅占32%。低收入的黑人受访者更多地吃了野鱼和野味,而高收入的黑人受访者则吃了更多的鹿。数据表明,管理人员和计划人员在(1)进行暴露评估,(2)考虑野生鱼和野味的消费方式以及(3)管理野生鱼和野味的风险时应考虑年龄,种族和收入。该数据对于正在设计消费咨询的政策制定者和风险管理人员,对于风险传播者确定目标受众以及为污染站点设计长期管理人员特别有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号