首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Endodontics: Official Journal of American Association of Endodontists >Glide Path Management with Single- and Multiple-instrument Rotary Systems in Curved Canals: A Micro Computed Tomographic Study
【24h】

Glide Path Management with Single- and Multiple-instrument Rotary Systems in Curved Canals: A Micro Computed Tomographic Study

机译:弯道中单器械和多器械旋转系统的滑行路径管理:微型计算机断层扫描研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Introduction: Securing a reproducible glide path before instrumentation is recommended to maintain the original geometry of the root canal system and to prevent file separation. Mechanical glide path management systems have been introduced to expedite this step. The aim of this study was to compare apical transportation, canal volume increase, and working time during glide path management with Pro Glider (PG; Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK) and Path Files (PF, Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties). Methods: Forty curved nnesial canals of mandibular molars were randomly allocated into 2 experimental groups (n = 20) according to the glide path management system: PG or PF. A glide path was achieved according to the manufacturers' protocol. Micro computed tomographic analysis was performed to assess apical transportation at 1, 3, and 5 mm and volume increase. The time required to achieve the glide path was measured. Results: The overall apical transportation mean values (+/- standard error) were 13.33 +/- 3.37 mu m for PG and 19.21 +/- 4.4 mu m for PF (P > .05). The mean (+/- standard error) volume increase values were 0.49 +/- 0.06 mm(3) for PG and 0.48 +/- 0.06 mm(3) for PF (P > .05). A statistically significant difference in the working time was found between the groups (P < .0001) where the mean (+/- standard error) values for time were 7.38 +/- 1.73 seconds for PG and 20.61 +/- 5.54 seconds for PF. Conclusions: Similar apical transportation and volume increase occurred during glide path management with PG single-file and PF multi-file systems; however, PG achieved glide path faster than PF.
机译:简介:建议在器械安装之前确保可重现的滑行路径,以保持根管系统的原始几何形状并防止锉刀分离。机械滑行路径管理系统已被引入以加快这一步骤。这项研究的目的是比较Pro Glider(PG; Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties,Tulsa,OK)和Path Files(PF,Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties)在滑行路径管理过程中的根尖运输,运河增加和工作时间。方法:根据滑行路径管理系统:PG或PF,将40条弯曲的下颌磨牙乳突管随机分为2个实验组(n = 20)。根据制造商的协议实现了滑行路径。进行了微型计算机断层分析,以评估1、3和5毫米处的根尖运输和体积增加。测量达到滑行路径所需的时间。结果:PG的总根尖运输平均值(+/-标准误差)为13.33 +/- 3.37μm,PF的为19.21 +/- 4.4μm(P> 0.05)。 PG的平均(+/-标准误差)体积增加值为0.49 +/- 0.06 mm(3),而PF的为0.48 +/- 0.06 mm(3)(P> .05)。在两组之间的工作时间上有统计学上的显着差异(P <.0001),其中PG的平均时间(+/-标准误差)为7.38 +/- 1.73秒,PF的平均时间为(20.61 +/- 5.54秒) 。结论:PG单文件系统和PF多文件系统在滑行路径管理过程中发生了类似的根尖运输和体积增加。但是,PG的滑行路径比PF快。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号