首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Endodontics: Official Journal of American Association of Endodontists >Comparative evaluation of endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms.
【24h】

Comparative evaluation of endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms.

机译:对粪肠球菌生物膜的牙髓冲洗剂的比较评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of root canal irrigants against E. faecalis biofilms using a novel in vitro testing system. Biofilms grown in a flow cell system were submerged in test irrigants for either 1 or 5 minutes. Statistical analysis revealed a significant relationship between test agent and percentage kill of the biofilm bacteria (P < 0.05). No statistically significant relationship between time and percentage kill was found. The percentage kill of the biofilm bacteria was: 6% NaOCl (>99.99%), 1% NaOCl (99.78%), Smear Clear (78.06%), 2% chlorhexidine (60.49%), REDTA (26.99%), and BioPure MTAD (16.08%). Post-hoc analysis showed a significant difference between 1% and 6% NaOCl, and all other agents including Smear Clear, 2% chlorhexidine, REDTA, and BioPure MTAD (P < 0.05). Within the parameters of this study, both 1% NaOCl and 6% NaOCl were more efficient in eliminating E. faecalis biofilm than the other solutions tested.
机译:这项研究的目的是使用新型的体外测试系统,比较根管冲洗液对屎肠球菌生物膜的功效。将在流通池系统中生长的生物膜浸入测试冲洗液中1或5分钟。统计分析表明,测试剂与生物膜细菌的杀灭百分率之间存在显着关系(P <0.05)。在时间和杀死百分率之间未发现统计学上显着的关系。生物膜细菌的杀灭百分比为:6%NaOCl(> 99.99%),1%NaOCl(99.78%),Smear Clear(78.06%),2%洗必泰(60.49%),REDTA(26.99%)和BioPure MTAD (16.08%)。事后分析显示,NaOCl和其他所有试剂(包括Smear Clear,2%洗必泰,REDTA和BioPure MTAD)之间存在1%和6%的显着差异(P <0.05)。在这项研究的参数范围内,与其他测试溶液相比,1%NaOCl和6%NaOCl均能更有效地消除粪肠球菌生物膜。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号