Comparison instrumentation reamers and files versus a flat-sided design of conventional noninterrupted, flat-sided design.

摘要

The in vitro study measured the time required to instrument and shape canals by conventional reamers and files compared with a newly introduced reamer and file system. This experiment was divided into four groups with 10 block samples for each group. The results of instrumentation time demonstrate that the noninterrupted flat-sided design (EZ-Fill SafeSider reamers) produced the fastest times for comparably shaped canals because of reduced engagement of the instrument with the walls of the canal compared with conventional instruments. The conventional designs for both reamers and files result in increased instrumentation time compared with their EZ-Fill SafeSider counterparts.