首页> 外文期刊>International endodontic journal >Hard-tissue debris accumulation created by conventional rotary versus self-adjusting file instrumentation in mesial root canal systems of mandibular molars
【24h】

Hard-tissue debris accumulation created by conventional rotary versus self-adjusting file instrumentation in mesial root canal systems of mandibular molars

机译:下颌磨牙近中根管系统中常规旋转和自调节锉器械产生的硬组织碎片堆积

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Aim To evaluate the accumulation of hard-tissue debris when using the Self-adjusting File (SAF) system in mesial roots of mandibular molars with isthmuses and to compare it with that occurring when the ProTaper file system was used. Methodology Forty extracted human mandibular molars with joining mesial root canals and an isthmus between the two canals were randomly assigned to two experimental groups and scanned using micro-computed tomography. Root canals in the control group (N=20) were instrumented using the ProTaper rotary system until F3. Irrigation with 1mL of 3% NaOCl solution was applied after each instrument. Root canals in the experimental group (N=20) were prepared using the SAF for 4min, with continuous irrigation (3% NaOCl, 4mLmin -1). After rescanning, canals in both groups were further irrigated with 5mL of 17% EDTA for 2min. After final scanning, the per cent value of total canal system volume filled with hard-tissue debris was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney U-test; the alpha-type error was set at 1%. Results Instrumentation of the root canals with ProTaper left 10.1% (IQR 5.2) of the total canal system volume filled with hard-tissue debris while preparation with the SAF left 1.7% (IQR 1.6). This difference was highly significant (P0.0001). After subsequent EDTA irrigation, these values were significantly reduced (P0.01) to 7.9% (IQR 4.1) and 1.3% (IQR 0.8) in the ProTaper and SAF groups, respectively. Conclusion Preparation with the SAF system resulted in less hard-tissue debris accumulation in isthmus-containing root canal systems compared with instrumentation with ProTaper rotary files.
机译:目的评估使用自调整锉刀(SAF)系统在带有峡部的下颌磨牙的中牙根中硬组织碎片的积累,并将其与使用ProTaper锉刀系统时发生的情况进行比较。方法学将四十个提取的人下颌磨牙与连接的近中牙根管和两​​个管之间的峡部随机分配到两个实验组中,并使用微计算机断层扫描技术进行扫描。使用ProTaper旋转系统对对照组(N = 20)的根管进行测量,直到F3。每台仪器后均使用1mL的3%NaOCl溶液进行灌溉。实验组(N = 20)中的根管使用SAF连续冲洗4min(3%NaOCl,4mLmin -1)制备。重新扫描后,两组均再用5mL 17%EDTA冲洗2min。最终扫描后,计算出充满硬组织碎屑的总管系统容积的百分比值。使用Mann-Whitney U检验进行统计分析。 α型错误设置为1%。结果用ProTaper进行根管植入的器械仅占根管系统总体积的10.1%(IQR 5.2),而充满SAF的器械则占1.7%(IQR 1.6)。这种差异非常显着(P <0.0001)。在随后的EDTA灌溉后,ProTaper和SAF组的这些值分别显着降低(P <0.01)至7.9%(IQR 4.1)和1.3%(IQR 0.8)。结论与使用ProTaper旋转锉器械相比,使用SAF系统进行的准备工作可减少含地峡的根管系统中硬组织碎片的积聚。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号