首页> 外文期刊>Clinical therapeutics >Pretreatment with flurbiprofen axetil, flurbiprofen axetil preceded by venous occlusion, and a mixture of flurbiprofen axetil and propofol in reducing pain on injection of propofol in adult Japanese surgical patients: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
【24h】

Pretreatment with flurbiprofen axetil, flurbiprofen axetil preceded by venous occlusion, and a mixture of flurbiprofen axetil and propofol in reducing pain on injection of propofol in adult Japanese surgical patients: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

机译:在日本成年手术患者中用氟比洛芬酯,氟比洛芬酯预处理,静脉闭塞以及氟比洛芬酯和丙泊酚的混合物预处理可减轻注射丙泊酚时的疼痛:一项前瞻性,随机,双盲,安慰剂对照研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Pain on injection of propofol is a common clinical problem. Flurbiprofen axetil, an injectable prodrug of flurbiprofen, with or without venous occlusion has been reported to reduce this pain. A search of the existing literature did not identify comparative studies of 3 different techniques, including pretreatment with flurbiprofen axetil, flurbiprofen axetil preceded by venous occlusion, and mixture of propofol and flurbiprofen axetil, for reducing pain on injection of propofol. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of these 3 different techniques of flurbiprofen axetil administration in reducing pain on injection of propofol. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled study was conducted at the Department of Anesthesiology, Ushiku Aiwa General Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan. Japanese elective surgical patients, aged 20 to 65 years, were enrolled and were randomly divided into 6 groups: the control group received placebo (saline) before administration of IV propofol 0.5 mg/kg; the flurbiprofen group was pretreated with IV flurbiprofen axetil 50 mg before injection of propofol 0.5 mg/kg; the tourniquet control group received placebo (saline) with a tourniquet for 2 minutes followed by administering propofol 0.5 mg/kg; the tourniquet flurbiprofen group was pretreated with flurbiprofen axetil 50 mg with a tourniquet for 2 minutes followed by administering propofol 0.5 mg/kg; the mixed control group was induced with a mixture of placebo (saline) and propofol 0.5 mg/kg; and the mixed flurbiprofen group was induced with a mixture of flurbiprofen axetil 50 mg and propofol 0.5 mg/kg. Immediately after administering propofol into the largest vein of the hand through a 20-gauge intravenous cannula, an investigator blinded to group assignment asked the patient to assess pain intensity at the injection site using a 4-point verbal rating scale: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe. Adverse effects (AEs) at the injection site (pain, edema, wheal, or inflammation) were assessed by the investigator for 24 hours after surgery using spontaneous reporting and patient interview. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-five patients were assessed for inclusion. A total of 150 patients (71 males, 79 females; mean [SD] age, 41 [10] years; mean [SD] height, 161 [9] cm; mean [SD] body weight, 58 [9] kg) were enrolled and completed the study. Each treatment group comprised 25 patients. No significant differences in the demographic characteristics were observed among the 6 groups. The overall incidence of pain on injection of propofol was 92% (23 of 25 patients) in the control group versus 60% (15/ 25) in the flurbiprofen group (P = 0.009); 84% (21/25) in the tourniquet control group versus 32% (8/25) in the tourniquet flurbiprofen group (P = 0.001); and 92% (23/25) in the mixed control group versus 80% (20/25) in the mixed flurbiprofen group (P = NS). The median pain score was significantly lower in the flurbiprofen group (1) compared with the control group (2) (P = 0.002); this score was significantly lower in the tourniquet flurbiprofen group (0) compared with the tourniquet control group (2) (P = 0.001); the score was comparable between the mixed control and mixed flurbiprofen groups (2 vs 2, respectively; P = NS). The incidence and severity of pain on injection of propofol were significantly less in the tourniquet flurbiprofen group compared with the flurbiprofen group (both, P < 0.05). No AEs at the injection site were observed or reported. CONCLUSION: In this study of adult Japanese surgical patients, pretreatment with flurbiprofen axetil 50 mg preceded by venous occlusion was found to be more effective in reducing pain on injection of propofol than the other flurbiprofen axetil administration strategies tested.
机译:背景:注射异丙酚疼痛是常见的临床问题。据报道,氟比洛芬的注射用氟比洛芬前药具有或不具有静脉阻塞作用,可减轻这种疼痛。对现有文献的搜索没有发现对3种不同技术的比较研究,包括用氟比洛芬axetil进行预处理,氟比洛芬axetil静脉封堵以及丙泊酚和氟比洛芬axetil的混合物以减少注射异丙酚时的疼痛。目的:本研究的目的是比较氟比洛芬阿奇替尼的这三种不同技术在减轻异丙酚注射疼痛方面的有效性。方法:这项前瞻性,随机,双盲,安慰剂对照研究在日本茨城县牛西爱华总医院麻醉科进行。入选20至65岁的日本择期外科手术患者,并将其随机分为6组:对照组在静脉注射丙泊酚0.5 mg / kg之前接受安慰剂(盐水);对照组在接受0.5 mg / kg丙泊酚治疗前接受安慰剂(盐水)。氟比洛芬组在注射丙泊酚0.5 mg / kg之前用静脉注射氟比洛芬酯50 mg预处理。止血带对照组接受带止血带的安慰剂(盐水)2分钟,然后服用丙泊酚0.5 mg / kg;止血带氟比洛芬组先用50 mg氟比洛芬酯和止血带预处理2分钟,然后再使用丙泊酚0.5 mg / kg。安慰剂(盐水)和丙泊酚0.5 mg / kg的混合物诱导混合对照组。氟比洛芬酯50 mg丙泊酚0.5 mg / kg混合液诱导氟比洛芬混合组。通过20口静脉插管将丙泊酚给药于手的最大静脉后,对研究组不知情的研究人员立即要求患者使用4点口头评分量表评估注射部位的疼痛强度:0 =无,1 =轻度,2 =中度和3 =严重。研究人员在手术后24小时采用自发报告和患者访谈的方式评估了注射部位的不良反应(AEs)(疼痛,水肿,风疹或炎症)。结果:155例患者被纳入评估。共有150名患者(男性71例,女性79例;平均[SD]年龄41岁[10]岁;平均[SD]身高161 [9] cm;平均[SD]体重58 [9] kg)参加并完成研究。每个治疗组包括25名患者。在6组之间没有观察到人口统计学特征的显着差异。对照组中注射异丙酚的总疼痛发生率为92%(25名患者中的23名),而氟比洛芬组为60%(15/25)(P = 0.009);止血带对照组中84%(21/25),而止血带氟比洛芬组中32%(8/25)(P = 0.001);混合对照组为92%(23/25),而混合氟比洛芬组为80%(20/25)(P = NS)。氟比洛芬组(1)的中位疼痛评分显着低于对照组(2)(P = 0.002);止血带氟比洛芬组(0)的结果明显低于止血带对照组(2)(P = 0.001);混合对照组和氟比洛芬组之间的评分相当(分别为2 vs 2; P = NS)。止血带氟比洛芬组与氟比洛芬组相比,注射丙泊酚时疼痛的发生率和严重程度均显着降低(均P <0.05)。在注射部位未观察到或报道不良事件。结论:在这项对日本成年手术患者的研究中,发现氟比洛芬酯50 mg预先治疗并进行静脉闭塞比使用其他氟比洛芬酯治疗策略更有效地减轻了异丙酚注射时的疼痛。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号