首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endovascular therapy: an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists >Learning curve for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: evaluation of a 277-patient single-center experience.
【24h】

Learning curve for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: evaluation of a 277-patient single-center experience.

机译:血管内腹主动脉瘤修复的学习曲线:277位患者的单中心经验评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: To determine the minimum number of stent-graft deployments that an interventional team with endovascular skills must do to be considered well trained in endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) exclusion. Methods: The records of 277 consecutive patients (236 men; median age 73 years, range 49-91) undergoing endovascular AAA repair at a single institution between 1994 and 1998 were reviewed. Information was collected on procedural success, conversion, time interval between procedures, operative complications, operative mortality, contrast volume, blood loss, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS. A first-order differential equation was used to calculate a learning curve based on the success rate. Patients were subsequently divided into 5 sequential groups of 55 patients (the last group had 57 patients). Results: Analyzing the pattern of procedural success to failures, a sharp change in the slope was observed between 50 and 65 trials. The number 55 was arbitrarily chosen to represent the point after which the incremental change in the success rate never exceeded 0.01 (<1 failure per 100 attempts). In the intergroup comparisons, success rate (p<0.04), conversion rate (p<0.0001), and procedural frequency (p<0.0001) were statistically significant when the first 55-patient group was compared to the others. Operative complications (p=0.08) and operative mortality (p=0.16) were numerically but not significantly different. Contrast volume was significantly reduced for the last group (p<0.0001). A Cox regression model identified only procedural frequency (p=0.03) and procedural volume (p=0.04) as predictive of technical success. Performing endovascular AAA repairs at a 80% success rate. Conclusions: This study shows that not only is the number of procedures important to outcome, but also the frequency with which they are performed. Based on our team's performance data, 55 cases would appear to be the minimum volume and 1 case every 10 days the minimum frequency to obtain good operative results with aortic endografting.
机译:目的:为了确定具有血管内技能的介入小组必须做的最少支架植入物部署,必须考虑对其进行血管内腹主动脉瘤(AAA)排除训练有素。方法:回顾性分析了1994年至1998年间在同一机构接受血管内AAA修复的277例连续患者(236名男性,中位年龄73岁,范围49-91)的记录。收集有关程序成功,转换,手术间隔时间,手术并发症,手术死亡率,造影剂量,失血量,重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间(LOS)和医院LOS的信息。一阶微分方程用于根据成功率计算学习曲线。随后将患者分为5组,每组55位患者(最后一组为57位患者)。结果:分析从程序到失败的成功模式,在50到65个试验之间观察到斜率的急剧变化。任意选择数字55代表成功率的增量变化从未超过0.01(每100次尝试<1次失败)的点。在组间比较中,将前55名患者与其他患者进行比较时,成功率(p <0.04),转换率(p <0.0001)和手术频率(p <0.0001)具有统计学意义。手术并发症(p = 0.08)和手术死亡率(p = 0.16)在数值上无明显差异。最后一组的造影剂体积明显减少(p <0.0001)。 Cox回归模型仅将程序频率(p = 0.03)和程序量(p = 0.04)确定为技术成功的预测。以 80%。结论:这项研究表明,不仅程序数量对结果很重要,而且执行频率也高。根据我们团队的表现数据,看来最小的体积为55例,每10天最少的频率为1例,以获得主动脉内移植的良好手术效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号