...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical therapeutics >Effects of armodafinil in the treatment of residual excessive sleepiness associated with obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome: a 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in nCPAP-adherent adults.
【24h】

Effects of armodafinil in the treatment of residual excessive sleepiness associated with obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome: a 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in nCPAP-adherent adults.

机译:阿莫达非尼对与阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停/呼吸不足综合征相关的残余过度嗜睡的治疗作用:一项为期12周的多中心,双盲,随机,安慰剂对照研究,研究对象为nCPAP坚持的成年人。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Some patients with obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSA/HS) experience excessive sleepiness (ES) that might not resolve with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) treatment. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of armodafinil 150 or 250 mg QD when used as adjunctive treatment for residual ES associated with OSA/HS in patients who are adherent to nCPAP therapy. METHODS: This 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted at 37 centers in the United States and Canada. Male and female patients aged 18 to 65 years with residual ES associated with OSA/HS were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to receive armodafinil 150 or 250 mg or placebo PO QD for 12 weeks. Assessments were conducted at baseline and study weeks 4, 8, and 12 and included the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) to determine wakefulness, the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) to determine improvement inclinical condition, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) to determine patient-estimated wakefulness, the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) to determine global fatigue, and the Cognitive Drug Research computerized assessment battery. To distinguish between earlier and later effects, sleep latencies, assessed using the MWT, were averaged across the first 4 (9 and 11 AM, and 1 and 3 PM) and last 3 (3, 5, and 7 PM) tests. Tolerability assessments included monitoring of adverse events (AEs), clinical laboratory tests, vital sign measurements, and electrocardiography. RESULTS: A total of 395 patients were enrolled in the study (armodafinil 150 mg/d, 133; armodafinil 250 mg/d, 131; placebo, 131); 392 received >or=1 dose of study drug (armodafinil 150 mg/d, 131; armodafinil 250 mg/d, 131; placebo, 130). The armodafinil and placebo groups were well matched with regard to age (mean [SD], 49.2 [8.9] vs 50.1 [9.4] years), sex (71 vs 69% men), race (84% vs 87% white), and body weight (mean [SD], 110.3 [24.9] vs 111.9 [24.0] kg). At the final visit, the mean (SD) change from baseline in MWT sleep latency across the morning and afternoon was significantly greater in the armodafinil combined group compared with the placebo group (+1.9 [7.3] vs 1.7 [8.6] minutes; P < 0.001). Also at the final visit, the proportions of patients who showed at least minimal improvement on the CGI-C, and the mean (SD) changes from baseline in ESS and BFI scores, were significantly greater in the armodafinil group compared with those in the placebo group (72% vs 37%, -5.5 [5.0] vs -3.3 [4.7], and -1.2 [2.2] vs -0.6 [2.0], respectively; P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.01, respectively). No significant effects on nighttime sleep, as assessed using polysomnography, were found with armodafinil. AEs reported in the armodafinil combined and placebo groups were headache, nausea, insomnia, anxiety, and dizziness. Serious AEs (ulcerative colitis, migraine, worsening of Axis II and mood disorder, and duodenal ulcer) were reported in 4 (1.5%) patients receiving armodafinil and were considered by the investigator not or unlikely to be drug related. CONCLUSIONS: In this selected population of patients with OSA/HS and residual ES despite effective treatment with nCPAP, armodafinil QD used as an adjunct to nCPAP treatment was associated with improved wakefulness and overall clinical condition. Clinical benefit was shown at the first assessment and maintained for the 12-week duration of the study. Armodafinil was also associated with significantly reduced interference of ES with daily activities and global fatigue. Armodafinil was well tolerated, with no adverse effect on nighttime sleep or nCPAP use.
机译:背景:一些患有阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停/呼吸不足综合征(OSA / HS)的患者会经历过度的嗜睡(ES),而鼻腔持续气道正压通气(nCPAP)治疗可能无法解决。目的:本研究旨在评估阿莫达非尼150或250 mg QD在辅助治疗nCPAP治疗的患者中与OSA / HS相关的残留ES的辅助治疗时的疗效和耐受性。方法:这项为期12周的多中心,双盲,随机,安慰剂对照研究是在美国和加拿大的37个中心进行的。纳入年龄在18至65岁之间且残留OS与OSA / HS相关的ES的男性和女性患者。患者被随机分配接受150或250 mg阿莫达非尼或安慰剂PO QD治疗12周。在基线和研究第4、8和12周进行评估,包括维持觉醒测试(MWT)以确定觉醒,临床总体变化印象(CGI-C)以确定改善的临床状况,爱普沃思嗜睡量表( ESS)来确定患者估计的清醒状态,简要疲劳清单(BFI)来确定整体疲劳,以及认知药物研究计算机化评估电池。为了区分较早和较晚的影响,使用MWT评估的睡眠潜伏期在前4次(上午9点和11点以及下午1点和3点)和最后3次(3点,5点和7点)测试中平均。耐受性评估包括监测不良事件(AE),临床实验室检查,生命体征测量和心电图检查。结果:共有395例患者入选该研究(阿莫达非尼150 mg / d,133;阿莫达非250 mg / d,131;安慰剂131)。 392人接受≥1剂量的研究药物(阿莫达非尼150 mg / d,131;阿莫达非250 mg / d,131;安慰剂,130)。阿莫达非尼和安慰剂组在年龄(平均[SD],49.2 [8.9]和50.1 [9.4]岁),性别(71%对69%的男性),种族(84%对87%的白人)和体重(平均[SD],110.3 [24.9] vs 111.9 [24.0] kg)。在最后一次就诊时,与安慰剂组相比,阿莫达非尼联合组的上午和下午,MWT睡眠潜伏期与基线相比的平均(SD)变化显着更大(+1.9 [7.3] vs 1.7 [8.6]分钟; P < 0.001)。同样在最后一次访视时,与安慰剂组相比,阿莫达非尼组的CGI-C改善至少达到最小程度,ESS和BFI得分相对于基线的平均(SD)变化的患者比例显着更高组(分别为72%vs 37%,-5.5 [5.0] vs -3.3 [4.7]和-1.2 [2.2] vs -0.6 [2.0];分别为P <0.001,P <0.001和P <0.01) 。用多导睡眠图评估发现,阿莫达非尼对夜间睡眠无明显影响。在Armodafinil联合安慰剂组中报告的AE为头痛,恶心,失眠,焦虑和头晕。据报告,接受阿莫达非尼的4名患者(1.5%)出现严重的AE(溃疡性结肠炎,偏头痛,轴心II恶化和情绪障碍以及十二指肠溃疡),研究者认为这些药物与药物无关或不太可能与药物相关。结论:尽管选择了nCPAP有效治疗,但在OSA / HS且残留ES的特定患者人群中,将armodafinil QD用作nCPAP治疗的辅助手段可改善清醒度和整体临床状况。在首次评估时就显示出临床获益,并在研究的12周内一直维持。 Armodafinil还可以显着减少ES对日常活动和整体疲劳的干扰。 Armodafinil具有良好的耐受性,对夜间睡眠或使用nCPAP没有不利影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号