首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endourology >Comparison of 0.625-mm source computed tomographic images versus 5-mm thick reconstructed images in the evaluation for renal calculi in at-risk patients
【24h】

Comparison of 0.625-mm source computed tomographic images versus 5-mm thick reconstructed images in the evaluation for renal calculi in at-risk patients

机译:0.625 mm源计算机断层扫描图像与5 mm厚重建图像在高危患者肾结石评估中的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and Purpose: CT has become a well-established modality in the evaluation of urinary calculi. The advent of multidetector CT (MDCT) scanners and submillimeter thick slice acquisitions has yielded CT images with even greater resolution. MDCT scanners allow for source data slice acquisition with submillimeter slice thickness. These source images can then be reconstructed to thicker slices for more convenient interpretation of the CT scan. Previous authors have looked at the effect of slice thickness on detection of urinary calculi. We investigated whether the thin slice source images yielded detection of additional stones and the potential significance of detecting these additional stones. Patients and Methods: Ninety-five consecutive patients who were referred to our outpatient imaging center for CT, with a clinical history placing them at risk for urinary calculi, were included in the study. Results: In 49 (52%) of the 95 patients, more calculi were visualized using the 0.625-mm thick images than with the 5-mm thick images. In 34 (69%) of these 49 patients, the additional findings were thought to be "clinically significant," while in the remaining 15 (31%) patients, the additional findings were not thought to be clinically significant. In 46 (48%) of the 95 patients, there were no additional urinary calculi identified on the 0.625-mm thick images compared with that observed on 5-mm thick images. Conclusion: The results from this study encourage reviewing the thin slice source images of MDCTs in patients at risk for urinary calculi, because important clinical decisions may hinge on the additional findings made on these images. ? 2013 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
机译:背景与目的:CT已成为评估尿路结石的公认方法。多探测器CT(MDCT)扫描仪和亚毫米厚切片采集的出现已经产生了分辨率更高的CT图像。 MDCT扫描仪允许以亚毫米切片的厚度采集源数据切片。然后可以将这些源图像重建为较厚的切片,以更方便地解释CT扫描。先前的作者已经研究了切片厚度对尿路结石检测的影响。我们调查了薄片源图像是否产生了其他结石的检测以及检测这些其他结石的潜在意义。患者和方法:该研究包括连续95例患者,这些患者被转诊至我们的门诊CT成像中心,其临床病史使他们有尿结石的风险。结果:在95例患者中,有49例(52%)使用0.625毫米厚的图像比5毫米厚的图像能看到更多的结石。在这49名患者中的34名(69%)中,其他发现被认为是“临床上有意义的”,而在其余15名患者(31%)中,其他发现被认为没有临床意义。在95例患者中,有46例(48%)在0.625毫米厚的图像上未发现与5毫米厚的图像上发现的其他尿路结石。结论:这项研究的结果鼓励审查有尿路结石风险的患者的MDCT薄片源图像,因为重要的临床决策可能取决于这些图像上的其他发现。 ? 2013 Mary Ann Liebert,Inc.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号