...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dentistry >Microhardness of dentin underneath fluoride-releasing adhesive systems subjected to cariogenic challenge and fluoride therapy.
【24h】

Microhardness of dentin underneath fluoride-releasing adhesive systems subjected to cariogenic challenge and fluoride therapy.

机译:牙本质在释放氟化物的粘合剂体系下的微硬度经历了致龋性挑战和氟化物治疗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the microhardness of dentin subjacent to the bonding interface of composite restorations using fluoride-releasing adhesive systems submitted to pH-cycling regimen associated or not to fluoride therapies. METHODS: Thirty human third molars were prepared with class V cavities with dentin cervical margins. The adhesive systems One-Up Bond F Plus (OU), Prime&Bond NT (NT), Clearfil Protect Bond (CF), Optibond Solo Plus (OP) and also the controls [-] Single Bond 2 (SB) and [+] Ketac Molar (KM) were used previously to composite resin restorations. The restorations were sectioned into four slabs and submitted to different storage media for 15 days: distilled water, pH-cycling, pH-cycling associated to NaF 0.05% and associated to NaF 1.23%. The Knoop microhardness test was performed in dentin at 50, 100, 150 and 300 microm from the adhesive interface. Data was analyzed by three-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD test (p<0.05). RESULTS: KM resulted in significantly higher microhardness when compared to all the adhesive systems at 50 microm, with the exception of OU, that was similar to KM when submitted to pH-cycling alone or associated to 1.23% NaF. Microhardness of dentin was significantly higher with all the tested materials, when pH-cycling was associated to NaF 0.05%, at 50 microm and 100 microm depths. OU resulted in similar dentin hardness at all depths and storage media. CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of NaF 0.05% fluoride therapy to the cariogenic challenge was capable to recover the original microhardness of dentin at 50 and 100 microm with all the tested materials.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是使用适用于与或不与氟化物治疗相关的pH循环方案的氟化物释放粘合剂系统,评估复合修复体结合界面以下的牙本质的显微硬度。方法:准备30例人类第三磨牙,使用具有牙本质颈缘的V级腔。胶粘剂体系One-Up Bond F Plus(OU),Prime&Bond NT(NT),Clearfil Protect Bond(CF),Optibond Solo Plus(OP)以及对照品[-] Single Bond 2(SB)和[+] Ketac摩尔(KM)以前用于复合树脂修复体。将修复体切成四块板,并在不同的存储介质中放置15天:蒸馏水,pH循环,与NaF相关的pH循环0.05%和与NaF相关的1.23%。努氏显微硬度测试是在距粘合界面50、100、150和300微米的牙本质中进行的。通过三向方差分析和Tukey HSD测试分析数据(p <0.05)。结果:与所有粘合剂体系(50微米)相比,KM引起的显微硬度明显更高,除了OU例外,这与单独进行pH循环或与1.23%NaF关联的KM相似。当pH循环与NaF 0.05%关联时,在50微米和100微米深度,所有测试材料的牙本质显微硬度均显着较高。 OU在所有深度和存储介质中都导致相似的牙本质硬度。结论:在所有致癌物质中加入0.05%的NaF氟化物治疗可以使牙本质恢复50和100微米的原始显微硬度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号