...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical therapeutics >Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of nasal versus intravenous midazolam in healthy dutch volunteers: a single-dose, randomized-sequence, open-label, 2-period crossover pilot study.
【24h】

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of nasal versus intravenous midazolam in healthy dutch volunteers: a single-dose, randomized-sequence, open-label, 2-period crossover pilot study.

机译:在健康的荷兰志愿者中,鼻用咪达唑仑与静脉用咪达唑仑的药代动力学和耐受性:一项单剂量,随机序列,开放标签,两期交叉试验研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Intranasal (IN) midazolam is a potential alternative to rectal diazepam for the acute treatment of epileptic seizures. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of IN midazolam (50 mg/mL) compared with intravenous (IV) midazolam (2.5 mg) in healthy adult volunteers. METHODS: In this single-dose, randomized-sequence, open-label, 2-period crossover pilot study subjects were randomly assigned to receive IN or IV midazolam, with a washout period of at least 5 days between treatments. The 50-mg/mL IN midazolam formulation consisted of 5 mg midazolam base per 0.1 mL (1 spray) and was administered once in 1 nostril. The IV midazolam solution (2.5 mg) was infused over 10 seconds. Blood samples were taken before and at regular intervals up to 240 minutes after dosing. Pharmacokinetic data (ie, C(max), T(max), t((1/2)), and AUC) were analyzed using a 2-compartment model. RESULTS: Of 9 volunteers screened and enrolled, 7 completed the study (mean age 34.1 [9.0] years; mean weight, 68.6 [10.4] kg, range 53-89 kg; 6 men, 3 women; all white). The mean C(max) of 78 (40) ng/mL was reached 44 minutes after IN administration, whereas the mean C(max) was 51 (5) ng/mL after IV administration. The mean estimated C(t=5 min) was 31.4 (28.1) ng/mL after IN administration. The elimination t((1/2)) was 1.9 (0.41) hours for IN midazolam and 2.3 (0.19) hours for IV midazolam. The bioavailability of IN midazolam was 82%. There were few adverse events, with a local burning feeling in the nose being the most reported event (6 of 7 subjects). CONCLUSIONS: In this select group of healthy volunteers, concentrations of midazolam >30 ng/mL were reached within 5 minutes of IN administration at a dose of 5 mg/0.1 mL. A burning feeling in the nostril was the main adverse effect. Additional research is needed to evaluate the safety profile, convenience, satisfaction, and efficacy of nasal midazolam in the treatment of adults with seizures. This trial is registered at www.isrctn.org, No. ISRCTN79059168.
机译:背景:鼻内咪达唑仑(midazolam)是直肠地西di的一种潜在替代品,可用于急性治疗癫痫发作。目的:本实验的目的是研究健康成人志愿者中静脉注射静脉注射咪达唑仑(2.5 mg)与静脉注射静脉注射咪达唑仑(2.5 mg)相比,IN咪达唑仑(50 mg / mL)的药代动力学和耐受性。方法:在该单剂量,随机序列,开放标签,2期交叉试验研究对象中,随机分配受试者接受IN或IV咪达唑仑,治疗之间的冲洗期至少为5天。 50 mg / mL IN咪达唑仑制剂每0.1 mL含5 mg咪达唑仑碱(1喷雾剂),每1鼻孔给药一次。在10秒内注入IV咪达唑仑溶液(2.5mg)。在给药前和给药后直至240分钟的固定间隔采集血样。使用2室模型分析药代动力学数据(即C(max),T(max),t((1/2))和AUC)。结果:筛选并招募了9名志愿者,其中7名完成了研究(平均年龄34.1 [9.0]岁;平均体重68.6 [10.4] kg,范围53-89 kg; 6名男性,3名女性;全白人)。 IN给药后44分钟,平均C(max)为78(40)ng / mL,而IV给药后,平均C(max)为51(5)ng / mL。 IN给药后的平均估计C(t = 5分钟)为31.4(28.1)ng / mL。对于IN咪达唑仑,消除t((1/2))为1.9(0.41)小时,对于IV咪达唑仑,消除t((1/2))为2.3(0.19)小时。 IN咪达唑仑的生物利用度为82%。几乎没有不良事件发生,鼻子局部烧灼感是报告最多的事件(7名受试者中的6名)。结论:在这组健康志愿者中,以5 mg / 0.1 mL的剂量在IN给药后5分钟内达到了> 30 ng / mL的咪达唑仑浓度。主要的不良反应是鼻孔灼热感。需要进一步的研究来评估鼻咪达唑仑在治疗成人癫痫发作中的安全性,便利性,满意度和疗效。该试验已在www.isrctn.org上注册,编号为ISRCTN79059168。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号