...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine: CCLM >Selecting clinically relevant populations for reference intervals.
【24h】

Selecting clinically relevant populations for reference intervals.

机译:选择临床相关人群作为参考间隔。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The selection of individuals to represent a group for any purpose can commit the effort to success or failure from the very outset. The description of this group must reflect what is, in reality, the purpose for which the group is being studied. Considering that reference intervals are designed to assist clinicians during diagnostic triage, criteria must reflect the nature of the subjects entering the system for care. The majority of people seeking care have non-life-threatening, yet troublesome complaints. In other words, persons who are in a reasonable state of health and who are not suffering from significant illness. Therefore the relevant cohort should fit this description, not individuals who lack any clinical or laboratory issues. Our focus is to employ reference intervals to exclude disease and not to define normality. Normality in the eyes of statisticians is quite different from the word as viewed by clinical staff, yet the term is used interchangeably without concern for its ultimate use. Asa result medicine today stumbles over this issue at every turn. Scientists and artists do not speak the same language. Compounding this awkward situation has been the conviction that by increasing laboratory precision and accuracy, the utility of laboratory data, reference intervals in particular, will improve clinical understanding. This has, after many years, not proven to be the case. What has become very evident, however, is that unsustainably large sums of money are being devoted to improving laboratory performance. To what end, when we are unable to grasp the significance of what is available now including published reference intervals for common test values? A realistic perspective on the value of prevailing laboratory performance, as illustrated by reference intervals, must be adopted. The obligation of laboratories, its regulators and professional groups is to create a sustainable mechanism to provide clinically usable information, in a timely and affordable manner, to our population and to those legions of less fortunate humans.
机译:出于任何目的选择代表一个团体的个人可以从一开始就致力于成功或失败。该小组的描述必须反映出实际上是该小组正在研究的目的。考虑到参考间隔是为诊断分诊期间的临床医生而设计的,标准必须反映进入系统进行护理的受试者的性质。寻求护理的大多数人都没有威胁生命的投诉。换句话说,处于健康状态且未患有严重疾病的人。因此,相关人群应符合此描述,而不是缺乏临床或实验室问题的个人。我们的重点是采用参考间隔来排除疾病,而不是确定正常性。在统计学家看来,常态性与临床工作人员所用的词完全不同,但该术语可互换使用而不必担心其最终用途。结果,今天的医学在每一个问题上都无所适从。科学家和艺术家讲的语言不同。人们认为,通过增加实验室的精确度和准确性,实验室数据的实用性(尤其是参考间隔)将改善临床理解,这使这种尴尬局面更加复杂。多年以来,事实并非如此。然而,已经变得非常明显的是,不可持续的大量资金被用于改善实验室性能。为了什么目的,当我们无法掌握现在可用的重要性时,包括已发布的常见测试值参考间隔?如参考间隔所示,必须采用对现行实验室性能值的现实观点。实验室,其监管者和专业团体的义务是建立一种可持续的机制,以及时,负担得起的方式向我们的人口以及不幸的那些人提供临床可用的信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号