首页> 外文期刊>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine: CCLM >Assay-dependent variability of serum insulin levels during oral glucose tolerance test: influence on reference intervals for insulin and on cut-off values for insulin sensitivity indices.
【24h】

Assay-dependent variability of serum insulin levels during oral glucose tolerance test: influence on reference intervals for insulin and on cut-off values for insulin sensitivity indices.

机译:口服葡萄糖耐量试验期间血清胰岛素水平的测定依赖性变异性:对胰岛素参考区间和胰岛素敏感性指数的临界值的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background: The oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT) is the most common method to estimate indices of insulin sensitivity in clinical as well as in epidemiological studies. The aim of this study was to investigate the variability of insulin levels for reference intervals and of insulin sensitivity indices during oGTT by three different insulin immunoassays. Methods: Serum insulin levels were determined during oGTT of randomly selected adult subjects (total n=101, with n=68 with normal glucose tolerance) by the LIAISON (LIA), the Elecsys (EL) and the AutoDELFIA (AD) method. Results: Sensitivity and precision of all three insulin assays were comparable. Insulin levels demonstrated a close (p<0.001) interassay correlation (LIA vs. EL: r=0.987, LIA vs. AD: r=0.966, EL vs. AD: r=0.965). Insulin levels and insulin sensitivity indices (n=68) of the AD method were significantly different compared to the LIA or EL assay (p<0.001). Basal insulin levels demonstrated an assay-dependent significant body massindex (BMI) dependency (LIA: r=0.24, p=0.05; AD: r=0.44, p<0.001; EL: r=0.36, p<0.01) in the regression analysis. At 120 min post glucose, gender was the relevant influencing factor on insulin levels of the LIA (r=0.40, p<0.001), AD (r=0.37, p<0.01) and EL (r=0.40 p<0.001) method. Conclusions: We conclude that assay-dependent reference intervals should be used for the clinical interpretation of insulin levels from oGTT and of insulin sensitivity indices. Moreover, BMI and gender have to be considered as influencing factors. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:240-6.
机译:摘要背景:口服葡萄糖耐量试验(oGTT)是评估临床和流行病学研究中胰岛素敏感性指标的最常用方法。这项研究的目的是通过三种不同的胰岛素免疫分析方法研究oGTT期间参考水平的胰岛素水平和胰岛素敏感性指数的变异性。方法:通过LIAISON(LIA),Elecsys(EL)和AutoDELFIA(AD)方法在随机选择的成年受试者(总计n = 101,n = 68,糖耐量正常)中确定血清胰岛素水平。结果:三种胰岛素测定法的灵敏度和精密度均具有可比性。胰岛素水平显示出密切的(p <0.001)批间相关性(LIA vs. EL:r = 0.987,LIA vs. AD:r = 0.966,EL vs. AD:r = 0.965)。与LIA或EL分析相比,AD方法的胰岛素水平和胰岛素敏感性指数(n = 68)显着不同(p <0.001)。基础胰岛素水平在回归分析中显示出与测定有关的显着体重指数(BMI)依赖性(LIA:r = 0.24,p = 0.05; AD:r = 0.44,p <0.001; EL:r = 0.36,p <0.01) 。葡萄糖注射后120分钟,性别是影响LIA(r = 0.40,p <0.001),AD(r = 0.37,p <0.01)和EL(r = 0.40 p <0.001)方法胰岛素水平的相关因素。结论:我们得出结论,应使用依赖于测定的参考区间从oGTT中对胰岛素水平和胰岛素敏感性指数进行临床解释。此外,必须将BMI和性别视为影响因素。 Clin Chem Lab Med 2008; 46:240-6。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号