首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes care >Limitations in the use of indices using glucose and insulin levels to predict insulin sensitivity: Impact of race and gender and superiority of the indices derived from oral glucose tolerance test in African Americans
【24h】

Limitations in the use of indices using glucose and insulin levels to predict insulin sensitivity: Impact of race and gender and superiority of the indices derived from oral glucose tolerance test in African Americans

机译:使用葡萄糖和胰岛素水平使用指数的限制预测胰岛素敏感性:种族和性别的影响以及非洲裔美国人口腔葡萄糖耐量试验的指数的影响和优越性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE-To examine the utility of commonly used insulin sensitivity indices in nondiabetic European Americans (EAs) and African Americans (AAs). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-Two-hundred forty nondiabetic participants were studied. Euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp was the gold standard approach to assess glucose disposal rates (GDR) normalized by lean body mass. The homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and the quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) were calculated from fasting plasma glucose and insulin (FIL). Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed to determine Matsuda index, the simple index assessing insulin sensitivity (SIisOGTT), Avignon index, and Stomvoll index. Relationships among these indices with GDR were analyzed by multiple regression. RESULTS-GDR values were similar in EA and AA subgroups; even so, AA exhibited higher FIL and were insulin-resistant compared with EA, as assessed by HOMA-IR, QUICKI, Matsuda index, SIisOGTT, Avignon index, and Stumvoll index. In the overall study population, GDR was significantly correlated with all studied insulin sensitivity indices (/r/ = 0.381-0.513); however, these indices were not superior to FIL in predicting GDR. Race and gender affected the strength of this relationship. In AA males, FIL and HOMA-IR were not correlated with GDR. In contrast, Matsuda index and SIisOGTT were significantly correlated with GDR in AA males, and Matsuda index was superior to HOMA-IR and QUICKI in AAs overall. CONCLUSIONS-Insulin sensitivity indices based on glucose and insulin levels should be used cautiously as measures of peripheral insulin sensitivity when comparing mixed gender and mixed race populations. Matsuda index and SIisOGTT are reliable in studies that include AA males. ? 2013 by the American Diabetes Association.
机译:目的 - 探讨常用胰岛素敏感性指数在非糖尿病欧美(EAS)和非洲裔美国人(AAS)中的效用。研究设计和方法 - 研究了二百四十个非奶肉参与者。 Euglycemex-uphility胰蛋白酶纤维素是通过贫体质量评估血糖处理率(GDR)的金标准方法。胰岛素抵抗(HOMA-IR)的稳态模型评估及定量胰岛素敏感性检查指数(Quicki)计算了空腹血浆葡萄糖和胰岛素(FIL)。进行口腔葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)以确定Matsuda指数,简单指标评估胰岛素敏感性(Siisogtt),Avignon指数和难道指数。通过多元回归分析了GDR之间这些指数之间的关系。结果-GDR值在EA和AA子组中类似;即便如此,与EA相比,AA均显示出更高的植物,与EA相比,由HOMA-IR,Quicki,Matsuda指数,Siisogtt,Avignon指数和Stumvold指数评估。在整体研究人群中,GDR与所有研究的胰岛素敏感指数明显相关(/ r / = 0.381-0.513);但是,这些指数并不优于预测GDR中的。种族和性别影响了这种关系的力量。在AA雄性中,FIL和HOMA-IR与GDR无关。相比之下,Matsuda指数和Siisogt在AA男性中与GDR显着相关,Matsuda指数优于Homa-IR和AAS的Quicki。结论 - 基于葡萄糖和胰岛素水平的胰岛素敏感性指数应致致致意地作为在比较混合性别和混合种族群体时的外周胰岛素敏感性的测量。 Matsuda指数和Siisogt在包括AA雄性的研究中是可靠的。还是2013年由美国糖尿病协会。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Diabetes care》 |2013年第4期|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Nutrition Sciences University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham AL United States;

    Department of Exercise Science and Sport Management Kennesaw State University Kennesaw GA;

    Department of Nutrition Sciences University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham AL United States;

    Division of Endocrinology University of South Carolina School of Medicine Columbia SC United;

    Department of Nutrition Sciences University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham AL United;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 内分泌腺疾病及代谢病;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号