首页> 外文期刊>Journal of critical care >Biophilosophical criticisms of brain death: The need for a new paradigm
【24h】

Biophilosophical criticisms of brain death: The need for a new paradigm

机译:对脑死亡的生物学批评:对新范式的需求

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There are good reasons why those declared dead on neurologic criteria are dead, but they are not necessarily the reasons that have been traditionally endorsed. In recent years, it has become increasingly clear that "brain-dead" bodies are not dead on biological grounds, which means the definition of death and the operational criteria to satisfy it are not consistent with one another. In other words, it is entirely possible to fulfill the neurologic criterion of death (a dead brain) but not the definition of death (cessation of integrated functioning or fundamental work of the organism) [1].
机译:有充分的理由说明那些在神经系统标准上宣告死亡的人已经死亡,但不一定是传统上认可的原因。近年来,越来越明显的是,“脑死亡”尸体并非以生物学为基础而死亡,这意味着死亡的定义和满足这一要求的操作标准彼此不一致。换句话说,完全有可能满足死亡的神经学标准(大脑死亡),但不能满足死亡的定义(停止有机体的综合功能或基本工作)[1]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号