首页> 外文期刊>Journal of chromatography, A: Including electrophoresis and other separation methods >High-performance thin-layer chromatographic fingerprints of isoflavonoids for distinguishing between Radix Puerariae lobate and Radix Puerariae thomsonii
【24h】

High-performance thin-layer chromatographic fingerprints of isoflavonoids for distinguishing between Radix Puerariae lobate and Radix Puerariae thomsonii

机译:异黄酮的高效薄层色谱指纹图谱,用于区分葛根和葛根

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The roots of Pueraria lobata (Wild.) Ohwi and Pueraria thomsonii Benth have been officially recorded in all editions of Chinese Pharmacopoeia under the same monograph 'Gegen' (Radix Puerariae, RP). However, in its 2005 edition, the two species were separated into both individual monographs, namely 'Gegen' (Radix Puerariae Lobatae, RPL) and 'Fenge' (Radix Puerariae Thomsonii, RPT), respectively, due to their obvious content discrepancy of puerarin, the major active constituent. In present paper, the fingerprint of high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) combining digital scanning profiling was developed to identify and distinguish the both species in detail. The unique properties of the HPTLC fingerprints were validated by analyzing ten batches of Pueraria lobata and R thomsonii samples, respectively. The common pattern of the HPTLC images of the roots of Pueraria spp. and the respective different ratios of the chemical distribution can directly discern the two species. The corresponding digital scanning profiles provided an easy way for quantifiable comparison among the samples. Obvious difference in ingredient content and HPTLC patterns of the two species questioned their bio-equivalence and explained that recording both species separately in the current edition of Chinese Pharmacopoeia (2005 edition) is reasonable due to not only the content of major constituent, puerarin, but also the peak-to-peak distribution in the fingerprint and integration value of the total components. Furthermore, the HPTLC fingerprint is also suitable for rapid and simple authentication and comparison of the subtle difference among samples with identical plant resource but different geographic locations. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:野葛(Pueraria lobata)(野葛)和葛根(Pueraria thomsonii Benth)的根已在《中国药典》所有版本的同一专着《 Gegen》(Radix Puerariae,RP)上正式记录。然而,在2005年版中,由于葛根素含量上的明显差异,这两个物种分别被分为两个专着,分别是'Gegen'(葛根葛根,RPL)和'Fenge'(葛根汤姆逊,RPT)。 ,主要有效成分。本文开发了结合数字扫描分析的高效薄层色谱(HPTLC)指纹,以详细识别和区分这两种物质。通过分别分析十批次的葛根和汤姆逊氏菌样品验证了HPTLC指纹的独特性质。葛根的HPTLC图像的常见模式。化学分布的不同比例可以直接辨别这两种。相应的数字扫描配置文件为样本之间的定量比较提供了一种简便的方法。这两个物种的成分含量和HPTLC模式存在明显差异,质疑了它们的生物等效性,并解释说,在当前版本的中国药典(2005年版)中分开记录这两个物种是合理的,这不仅是因为主要成分葛根素的含量,而且还有指纹峰间分布和总成分的积分值。此外,HPTLC指纹还适用于快速简单的身份验证以及具有相同植物资源但地理位置不同的样品之间细微差异的比较。 (c)2006 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号