...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition. >Esomeprazole- or rabeprazole-based triple therapy eradicated Helicobacter pylori comparably regardless of clarithromycin susceptibility and CYP2C19 genotypes
【24h】

Esomeprazole- or rabeprazole-based triple therapy eradicated Helicobacter pylori comparably regardless of clarithromycin susceptibility and CYP2C19 genotypes

机译:基于埃索美拉唑或雷贝拉唑的三联疗法可根除幽门螺杆菌,无论克拉霉素敏感性和CYP2C19基因型如何

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of esomeprazole-based triple therapy compared with rabeprazole-based triple therapy according to CYP2C19 genotype and clarithromycin susceptibility status for first-line eradication therapy of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylon) in Japan. We enrolled 219 H. pylori-infected patients, and randomly allocated patients to the EAC group (esomeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 200 mg, amoxicillin 750 mg for one week, with all drugs given twice daily) or RAC group (rabeprazole 10 mg, clarithromycin 200 mg, amoxicillin 750 mg for one week, with all drugs given twice daily). The H. pylori eradication rate according to the PP analyses was 75.0% (95% CI: 65.2-82.8%) in the EAC group and 71.4% (95% CI: 61.4-79.1%) in the RAC group. There were no statistically significant differences. The eradication rates of the clarithromycin-resistant/-sensitive strains were, respectively, 45.0% (95% CI: 30.7-60.2%)/98.0% (95% CI: 88.7-100%) in the EAC group and 39.5% (95% CI: 25.6-55.3%)/93.5% (95% CI: 81.9-98.4%) in the RAC group. The eradication rate of the clarithromycin-sensitive strains was significantly higher than that of the resistant strains in both groups. In conclusion, EAC and RAC therapies show a comparable efficacy regardless of the CYP2C19 genotype and clarithromycin susceptibility status in Japan.
机译:本研究的目的是根据CYP2C19基因型和克拉霉素易感性状态,评估基于埃索美拉唑的三联疗法与基于雷贝拉唑的三联疗法在日本根除幽门螺杆菌(H.pylon)的一线治疗的疗效。我们招募了219例受幽门螺杆菌感染的患者,并将患者随机分为EAC组(埃索美拉唑20 mg,克拉霉素200 mg,阿莫西林750 mg一周,所有药物每天两次)或RAC组(雷贝拉唑10 mg,克拉霉素) 200毫克,阿莫西林750毫克,持续一周,所有药物每天两次。根据PP分析,EAC组的幽门螺杆菌根除率为75.0%(95%CI:65.2-82.8%),而RAC组为71.4%(95%CI:61.4-79.1%)。没有统计学上的显着差异。 EAC组对克拉霉素耐药/敏感菌株的根除率分别为45.0%(95%CI:30.7-60.2%)/ 98.0%(95%CI:88.7-100%)和39.5%(95) RAC组中的%CI:25.6-55.3%)/ 93.5%(95%CI:81.9-98.4%)。两组对克拉霉素敏感菌株的根除率均显着高于耐药菌株。总之,EAC和RAC疗法在日本的CYP2C19基因型和克拉霉素易感性方面均显示出可比的疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号