首页> 外文期刊>Journal of computer assisted tomography >Magnetization transfer imaging of the pituitary: further insights into the nature of the posterior 'bright spot'.
【24h】

Magnetization transfer imaging of the pituitary: further insights into the nature of the posterior 'bright spot'.

机译:垂体的磁化转移成像:进一步了解后“亮点”的性质。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: After more than a decade of investigation, the chemical nature of the posterior pituitary "bright spot" remains elusive. Speculations into the source of this high signal have included relaxation of water by phospholipid vesicles, vasopressin, paramagnetic substances, and membrane-associated proteins. We hypothesized that if the T1 shortening observed in this structure were caused by water/macromolecular interactions, this interaction could be modulated by the use of magnetization transfer (MT) saturation. METHOD: Twenty-five normal subjects were recruited over a 2 month period who were identified on routine T1 sagittal head images to have pituitary bright spots with cross-sectional area of > 2 mm2. Thin section (4 mm), T1-weighted (SE 450/20) sagittal MR images were obtained both with and without the use of an MT suppression pulse (1,000 Hz offset, 200 Hz bandwidth, peak amplitude 7.3 microT). Region-of-interest measurements were made of the posterior pituitary lobe, anterior pituitary lobe, genu of corpus callosum, and pons, with MT ratios (MTRs) calculated for each structure. RESULTS: Relatively low (and similar) MTRs were observed in both parts of the pituitary gland: anterior lobe, 12.3%; posterior lobe 10.8%. Paired t test analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference between the MTRs of the anterior and posterior pituitary lobes (p = 0.23). Considerable suppression of signal was noted in the genu (MTR = 25.0%) and pons (MTR = 21.9%). The MTRs of both portions of the pituitary differed significantly from those of the genu and pons (p < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: The high signal of the posterior pituitary gland suppresses only slightly on MT images, having a behavior similar to that in the anterior lobe but significantly different from the rest of the brain. These findings suggest that direct water/macromolecule, water/membrane, or water/phospholipid interactions are not likely to be responsible for the appearance of the bright spot. The experimental results are more consistent with water interacting with a paramagnetic substance or low molecular weight molecule (e.g., vasopressin, neurophysins).
机译:目的:经过十多年的研究,垂体后叶“亮点”的化学性质仍然难以捉摸。对这种高信号来源的猜测包括磷脂囊泡,加压素,顺磁性物质和膜相关蛋白使水松弛。我们假设,如果在此结构中观察到的T1缩短是由水/大分子相互作用引起的,则可以通过使用磁化转移(MT)饱和度来调节这种相互作用。方法:在2个月的时间里招募了25名正常受试者,他们在常规T1矢状头图像上被发现具有垂体亮点,其横截面积> 2 mm2。在使用和不使用MT抑制脉冲(1,000 Hz偏移,200 Hz带宽,峰值幅度7.3 microT)的情况下,均获得了薄切片(4毫米),T1加权(SE 450/20)矢状MR图像。对垂体后叶,垂体前叶,call体属和脑桥进行感兴趣的区域测量,并为每个结构计算MT比(MTR)。结果:在垂体的两个部位均观察到了相对较低(和相似)的MTR:前叶为12.3%;前叶为12.3%。后叶10.8%。配对t检验分析显示垂体前叶和垂体后叶的MTR之间无统计学显着性差异(p = 0.23)。在类别(MTR = 25.0%)和pons(MTR = 21.9%)中注意到对信号的显着抑制。垂体两部分的MTR与属和脑桥的MTR显着不同(p <0.00001)。结论:垂体后叶的高信号仅在MT图像上受到轻微抑制,其行为与前叶相似,但与大脑其他部位明显不同。这些发现表明直接的水/大分子,水/膜或水/磷脂的相互作用不太可能造成亮点的出现。实验结果与水与顺磁性物质或低分子量分子(例如,加压素,神经元)相互作用的结果更加一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号