...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical anesthesia >The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure and continuous positive airway pressure on the oxygenation and shunt fraction during one-lung ventilation with propofol anesthesia.
【24h】

The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure and continuous positive airway pressure on the oxygenation and shunt fraction during one-lung ventilation with propofol anesthesia.

机译:异丙酚麻醉下单肺通气期间呼气末正压和持续气道正压对氧合和分流分数的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on the oxygenation and shunt fraction during one-lung ventilation (OLV). DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: Inpatient thoracic surgery and anesthesia clinic at an University hospital. PATIENTS: 15 patients with esophageal cancer who were scheduled for radical surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Arterial oxygenation, shunt fraction, and hemodynamics were evaluated at 20 min after the start of operation, at 20 minutes after the initiation of OLV under zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP), 20 minutes after the application of 4 cm PEEP to the dependent lung, at 20 minutes after OLV under ZEEP, 20 minutes after the application of 4 cm CPAP to the nondependent lung, and again under ZEEP, and after the combined application of PEEP and CPAP to the dependent and nondependent lungs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were no significant changes in mean pulmonary artery pressure, mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, mixed venous partial pressure of oxygen, or arterial and mixed venous saturation of oxygen (SVO(2)) during this study. Arterial partial pressure of oxygen (pO(2)) increased and shunt fraction values decreased significantly after the application of PEEP (pO(2); 197.8 +/- 32.9 mmHg, Qs/Qt; 22.9 +/- 5.6%), CPAP (pO(2); 212.6 +/- 15.9 mmHg, Qs/Qt; 22.8 +/- 5.9%), and combination of PEEP and CPAP (pO(2); 222.0 +/- 42.8 mmHg, Qs/Qt; 24.1 +/- 6.4%) compared with ZEEP (pO(2); 128.1 +/- 37.5 mmHg, Qs/Qt; 33.2 +/- 6.8% ). But there were no significant differences regarding oxygenation and shunt fraction during PEEP, CPAP, or the combination of PEEP and CPAP. CONCLUSIONS: The application of PEEP to the dependent lung, CPAP to the nondependent lung, and the combination of PEEP and CPAP, are useful for improving oxygenation and decreasing Qs/Qt.
机译:目的:评价呼气末正压(PEEP)和持续气道正压(CPAP)对单肺通气(OLV)期间氧合和分流分数的影响。设计:前瞻性临床研究。地点:大学医院的胸腔外科手术和麻醉诊所。患者:15例食管癌患者计划进行根治性手术。干预:在开始手术后20分钟,在零呼气末压力(ZEEP)下开始OLV后20分钟,在对患者施加4 cm PEEP 20分钟后评估动脉氧合,分流分数和血液动力学。依赖肺,在ZEEP下OLV后20分钟,对非依赖肺应用4 cm CPAP之后,再在ZEEP下20分钟,以及对依赖和非依赖肺联合应用PEEP和CPAP之后。测量和主要结果:在这项研究中,平均肺动脉压,平均动脉血压,心率,混合氧分压,或动脉和混合氧饱和度(SVO(2))均无显着变化。 PEAP(pO(2); 197.8 +/- 32.9 mmHg,Qs / Qt; 22.9 +/- 5.6%),CPAP(PEP(2);动脉血氧分压(pO(2))增加而分流分数值明显降低pO(2); 212.6 +/- 15.9 mmHg,Qs / Qt; 22.8 +/- 5.9%),以及PEEP和CPAP的组合(pO(2); 222.0 +/- 42.8 mmHg,Qs / Qt; 24.1 + / -ZEEP为6.4%)(pO(2); 128.1 +/- 37.5 mmHg,Qs / Qt; 33.2 +/- 6.8%)。但是,在PEEP,CPAP或PEEP和CPAP联合使用期间,氧合和分流分数没有显着差异。结论:PEEP应用于依赖肺,CPAP应用于非依赖肺,以及PEEP和CPAP的结合,对于改善氧合和降低Qs / Qt很有帮助。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号