...
首页> 外文期刊>British journal of anaesthesia >Reducing tidal volume and increasing positive end-expiratory pressure with constant plateau pressure during one-lung ventilation: Effect on oxygenation
【24h】

Reducing tidal volume and increasing positive end-expiratory pressure with constant plateau pressure during one-lung ventilation: Effect on oxygenation

机译:在单肺通气过程中以恒定的平台压力降低潮气量并增加呼气末正压:对氧合的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background. It is no longer safe to use large tidal volumes (V T) (8 ml kg -1) for one-lung ventilation (OLV), and limiting plateau pressure should be a major objective. Due to the specificity of OLV, the use of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) remains controversial. This study determined whether at the same low plateau pressure, reducing VT and increasing PEEP were not inferior to larger V T and lower PEEP ventilation in terms of oxygenation. Methods. This prospective, randomized, non-inferiority, cross-over trial included 88 patients undergoing open thoracotomy who received two successive ventilatory strategies in random order: V T (8 ml kg -1 of ideal body weight) with low PEEP (5 cm H 2O), or low VT (5 ml kg -1) with a high PEEP. Respiratory rate and PEEP were, respectively, adjusted to maintain constant ventilation and plateau pressure. The primary endpoint was the PaO 2/FIO 2 ratio under each ventilatory strategy. Results. The non-inferiority of low-V T ventilation could not be established. The mean adjusted PaO 2/FIO 2 ratio was lower overall during low-V T ventilation, and differences between the two ventilatory modes varied significantly according to baseline (T0) PaO 2/FIO 2. Decreased oxygenation during low V T was smaller when baseline values were low. Systolic arterial pressure was not lower during low-V T ventilation. Conclusion. During OLV, lowering V T and increasing PEEP, with the same low plateau pressure, reduced oxygenation compared with larger VT and lower PEEP. This strategy may reduce the risk of lung injury, but needs to be investigated further.
机译:背景。使用大潮气量(V T)(> 8 ml kg -1)进行单肺通气(OLV)不再安全,限制高原压力应该是主要目标。由于OLV的特异性,使用呼气末正压(PEEP)仍存在争议。这项研究确定了在相同的低高原压力下,VT降低和PEEP升高在氧合方面是否不劣于更大的V T和更低的PEEP通气。方法。这项前瞻性,随机,非劣效,交叉试验纳入了88位接受开胸手术的患者,他们随机接受了两种连续的通气策略:VT(理想体重8 ml kg -1)和低PEEP(5 cm H 2O)或低VT(5 ml kg -1)和高PEEP。分别调整呼吸频率和PEEP,以保持恒定的通气和高原压力。主要终点是每种通气策略下的PaO 2 / FIO 2比。结果。无法确定低V T通气的非劣效性。在低V T通气期间,平均调整后的PaO 2 / FIO 2比总体较低,并且两种通气模式之间的差异根据基线(T0)PaO 2 / FIO 2显着变化。低。在低V T通气期间收缩压不降低。结论。在OLV期间,与较低的VT和较低的PEEP相比,在相同的低高原压力下,降低V T和增加PEEP可以减少氧合。这种策略可以减少肺部受伤的风险,但是需要进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号