...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery >Effect of +3.00 diopter and +4.00 diopter additions in multifocal intraocular lenses on defocus profiles, patient satisfaction, and contrast sensitivity.
【24h】

Effect of +3.00 diopter and +4.00 diopter additions in multifocal intraocular lenses on defocus profiles, patient satisfaction, and contrast sensitivity.

机译:多焦点人工晶状体中+3.00屈光度和+4.00屈光度对散焦曲线,患者满意度和对比敏感度的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the new low-addition (add) (+3.00 diopter [D]) ReSTOR multifocal IOL compared with the preceding ReSTOR model with +4.00 D add. SETTING: University Eye Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany. DESIGN: Comparative case series. METHODS: Patients with a +3.00 D or +4.00 D add multifocal IOL were examined for uncorrected and distance-corrected visual acuity at distance, intermediate, and near. A defocus profile was assessed, individual reading distance and the distance for lowest intermediate visual acuity were determined. Patient satisfaction was evaluated with a standardized questionnaire. Contrast sensitivity was tested under mesopic and photopic conditions. RESULTS: Uncorrected and distance-corrected intermediate visual acuities were statistically significantly better in the +3.00 D add group (24 eyes) than in the +4.00 D add group (30 eyes); distance and near visual acuities were not different between groups. The defocus profile significantly varied between groups. The +4.00 D add group had a closer reading distance (33.0 cm) than the +3.00 D add group (43.5 cm), a closer point of lowest intermediate visual acuity (65.8 cm versus 86.9 cm) and worse lowest intermediate visual acuity (20/59 +/- 4.5 letters [SD] versus 20/48 +/- 5.5 letters). Thus, patients in the +3.00 D add group reported being more satisfied with intermediate visual acuity. The +3.00 D add group reported more glare but less halos than the +4.00 D add group; contrast sensitivity was not different. CONCLUSION: The lower addition resulted in a narrower defocus profile, a farther reading distance, and better intermediate visual acuity and thus increased patient satisfaction. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Additional disclosure is found in the footnotes.
机译:目的:评估新的低加法(加法)(+ 3.00屈光度[D])ReSTOR多焦点IOL与先前加+4.00 D的ReSTOR模型的优缺点。地点:德国图宾根大学眼科医院。设计:比较案例系列。方法:对+3​​.00 D或+4.00 D添加多焦点IOL的患者,检查其在远,中,近处的未矫正和经距离矫正的视敏度。评估散焦轮廓,确定个人阅读距离和最低中间视敏度的距离。用标准问卷评估患者满意度。在中视和明视条件下测试对比度灵敏度。结果:+3.00 D组(24眼)的未矫正和距离矫正的中间视力在统计学上显着优于+4.00 D组(30眼)。两组之间的远近视力无差异。散焦轮廓在组之间显着不同。 +4.00 D添加组的阅读距离(33.0 cm)比+3.00 D添加组的阅读距离(43.5 cm)更近,最低中间视敏度(65.8 cm对86.9 cm)和最低最低中间视敏度(20更近) / 59 +/- 4.5个字母[SD]与20/48 +/- 5.5个字母)。因此,+ 3.00 D添加组的患者报告对中间视力更为满意。 +3.00 D添加组比+4.00 D添加组报告更多的眩光,但光晕更少。对比敏感度没有不同。结论:较低的添加量导致更窄的散焦分布,更远的阅读距离和更好的中间视敏度,从而提高了患者满意度。财务披露:没有任何作者对所提及的任何材料或方法有财务或所有权利益。在脚注中可以找到其他披露内容。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号