...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical periodontology >Adjunctive effects to non-surgical periodontal therapy of systemic metronidazole and amoxycillin alone and combined.
【24h】

Adjunctive effects to non-surgical periodontal therapy of systemic metronidazole and amoxycillin alone and combined.

机译:单独和联合使用全身性甲硝唑和阿莫西林对非手术牙周治疗的辅助作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Several studies have reported adjunctive benefits to scaling and root planing (SRP) of systemic amoxycillin and metronidazole in the treatment of periodontal diseases. To date no comparisons have been made of these antimicrobials alone or in combination. The aim of this study was to compare the adjunctive benefits to SRP of amoxycillin and metronidazole alone and combined. METHODS: 66 subjects <46 years of age with advanced chronic periodontal disease participated in this randomised, double blind, 4 parallel treatment group designed study. All subjects received quadrant SRP and then were prescribed amoxycillin capsules (250 mg) and metronidazole tablets (200 mg) (AM) or lactate capsules and metronidazole (PM) or amoxycillin and calcium lactate tablets (AP) or lactate and calcium lactate (PP). All medication was 3 of each per day for 7 days. Subgingival plaque samples were obtained and probing depth (PD), loss of attachment (LOA), bleeding on probing (BOP), suppuration (SUPP) and plaque (DEP) were recorded pre-treatment, 1, 3 and 6 months post-treatment. RESULTS: Final group sizes were: AM=15, PM=16, AP=16 and PP=15. PD improved in all groups. Treatment effects were highly significantly different and always greatest in the AM and least in the PP groups. Benefits of PM and AP over PP were also noted. LOA improved in all groups and showed the same highly significant treatment differences, again favouring AM. BOP improved in all groups, particularly in AM compared to the other groups. SUPP improved in all groups and was virtually eradicated in AM with differences among treatments highly significant. DEP changed little in any group and there were no significant differences among groups. Microbiological data showed significant differences in favour of AM compared to PP and PM for total aerobes and anaerobes at 1 month. P. intermedia counts were always lower in active groups compared to PP and reached significance for AM and AP at 1 month and AM and PM at 3 months. CONCLUSION: The significant differences among treatment groups and the overall trend in the data, in line with other studies, support the considerable adjunctive benefits to SRP of amoxycillin and metronidazole combined in the treatment of advanced chronic periodontal disease.
机译:背景与目的:数项研究报告了全身性阿莫西林和甲硝唑在牙周疾病治疗中对结垢和生根的辅助益处。迄今为止,尚未对这些抗微生物剂单独或组合进行比较。这项研究的目的是比较单独和联合使用阿莫西林和甲硝唑对SRP的辅助益处。方法:66名<46岁的晚期慢性牙周病患者参加了这项随机,双盲,4个平行治疗组设计的研究。所有受试者均接受象限SRP,然后服用阿莫西林胶囊(250 mg)和甲硝唑片(200 mg)(AM)或乳酸盐胶囊和甲硝唑(PM)或阿莫西林和乳酸钙片(AP)或乳酸盐和乳酸钙(PP) 。所有药物均为每天3种,共7天。在治疗前,治疗后1、3和6个月获得牙龈下菌斑样品,并记录探查深度(PD),附着力丧失(LOA),探查出血(BOP),化脓(SUPP)和菌斑(DEP) 。结果:最终组大小为:AM = 15,PM = 16,AP = 16和PP = 15。所有组的PD均得到改善。治疗效果差异显着,在AM组和PP组中总是最大。还指出了PM和AP优于PP的优点。所有组的LOA均得到改善,并显示出相同的高度显着的治疗差异,再次有利于AM。与其他组相比,所有组的BOP均得到改善,尤其是AM。 SUPP在所有组中均得到改善,并且在AM中基本消除,治疗之间的差异非常显着。在任何组中,DEP的变化均很小,并且各组之间无显着差异。微生物数据显示,在1个月时,总需氧菌和厌氧菌对AM和PP和PM的支持率存在显着差异。与PP相比,活动组的中间疟原虫计数总是较低,并且在1个月时AM和AP以及3个月时AM和PM达到显着水平。结论:治疗组之间的显着差异和数据的总体趋势与其他研究一致,支持阿莫西林和甲硝唑联合治疗晚期慢性牙周病对SRP的明显辅助作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号