首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor/interleukin-3 fusion protein versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor after autologous bone marrow transplantation for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a randomized double-blind trial.
【24h】

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor/interleukin-3 fusion protein versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor after autologous bone marrow transplantation for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a randomized double-blind trial.

机译:自体骨髓移植治疗非霍奇金淋巴瘤后的粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子/白介素3融合蛋白与粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子:一项随机双盲试验的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: A phase III trial to compare PIXY321 with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) following high-dose therapy and autologous bone marrow transplant (ABMT) was conducted to evaluate the time to hematopoietic recovery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred seventy-seven patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) receiving ABMT were randomized to receive either PIXY321 750 micrograms/m2/d divided into two subcutaneous (SC) doses or GM-CSF 250 micrograms/m2/d as a 2-hour intravenous (IV) infusion starting on day 0 post-ABMT for a maximum of 28 days. RESULTS: The median time to reach an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > or = 500/microL in the PIXY321 group was 17 days versus 19 days in the GM-CSF group (P = .07) and the median time to reach platelet transfusion independence in the PIXY321 group was 25 days versus 23 days in the GM-CSF group (P = .30). The toxicity profiles of the two agents appeared to be equivalent with the exception of more patients in the PIXY321 group with a rash (64%) compared with the GM-CSF group (48%) (P = .028). A logistic regression model identified the use of a non-total-body irradiation (TBI) regimen and/or receipt of unpurged marrow and a body-surface area greater than 2.0 m2 as predictive of faster neutrophil engraftment, and those three factors, as well as the receipt of < or = two prior chemotherapy regimens as predictive for rapid platelet engraftment. CONCLUSION: There was a trend toward a slight improvement in neutrophil engraftment post-ABMT with the PIXY321 administered by an SC route compared with GM-CSF administered by an IV route. However, no differences could be identified between the two agents with respect to the time to platelet transfusion independence. Patient, regimen, and graft characteristics were most predictive of the engraftment tempo.
机译:目的:进行了一项III期试验,比较了大剂量治疗和自体骨髓移植(ABMT)后PIXY321与粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)的比较,以评估造血恢复的时间。患者和方法:将接受ABMT的177例非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)患者随机分为PIXY321 750毫克/平方米/天和皮下(SC)两种剂量或GM-CSF 250毫克/平方米/天。在ABMT后的第0天开始2小时的静脉(IV)输注,最多28天。结果:PIXY321组中性粒细胞绝对计数(ANC)>或= 500 / microL的中位时间为17天,而GM-CSF组中为19天(P = .07),并且达到血小板输注的中位时间PIXY321组的独立性为25天,而GM-CSF组为23天(P = .30)。与GM-CSF组(48%)相比,PIXY321组中有更多皮疹的患者(64%)与这两种药物的毒性曲线似乎相同(P = .028)。 Logistic回归模型确定了使用非全身照射(TBI)方案和/或接受未清洗的骨髓且体表面积大于2.0 m2可以预测中性粒细胞的更快植入,以及这三个因素作为接受<或=两个先前的化疗方案的参考,可以预测血小板的快速植入。结论:ABMT后中性粒细胞移植的趋势有一点改善,即通过SC途径给药的PIXY321与通过IV途径给药的GM-CSF相比有所改善。然而,就血小板输注独立时间而言,两种药物之间没有区别。患者,治疗方案和移植物特征最能预测植入速度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号