...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor after autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
【24h】

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor after autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

机译:自体和异体干细胞移植后预防性粒细胞集落刺激因子和粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: The primary objective of our meta-analysis was to determine whether prophylactic hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) after hematopoietic autologous and allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (SCT) reduced documented infections. Our secondary objectives were to determine whether prophylactic CSFs affected other outcomes including parenteral antibiotic therapy duration, infection-related mortality, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), or treatment-related mortality. METHODS: We included studies if there was random assignment between CSFs and placeboo therapy and CSFs were given after SCT and before recovery of neutrophils. From 3,778 reviewed study articles, 34 were included based on predefined inclusion criteria. All analyses were conducted using a random effects model. RESULTS: CSFs reduced the risk of documented infections (relative risk [RR] 0.87; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.00; P = .05) and duration of parenteral antibiotics (weighted mean difference, -1.39 days, 95% CI, -2.56 to -0.22; P = .02) but did not reduce infection-related mortality (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.44; P = .4). CSFs did not increase grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.31; P = .8) or treatment-related mortality (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.29; P = .98). CONCLUSION: CSFs were associated with a small reduction in the risk of documented infections but did not affect infection or treatment-related mortality.
机译:目的:我们的荟萃分析的主要目的是确定自体造血和同种异体干细胞移植(SCT)后预防性造血集落刺激因子(CSF)是否减少了已记录的感染。我们的次要目标是确定预防性CSF是否会影响其他结局,包括肠胃外抗生素治疗的持续时间,感染相关的死亡率,移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)或治疗相关的死亡率。方法:我们包括研究是否在脑脊液和安慰剂/无治疗之间随机分配,并且在SCT后和中性粒细胞恢复之前给予脑脊液。根据预定义的纳入标准,从3,778篇经审查的研究文章中,纳入了34篇。所有分析均使用随机效应模型进行。结果:CSFs降低了已证实感染的风险(相对风险[RR] 0.87; 95%CI,0.76至1.00; P = .05)和肠胃外抗生素的使用时间(加权平均差异,-1.39天,95%CI,-2.56)至-0.22; P = .02),但并未降低与感染相关的死亡率(RR,0.76; 95%CI,0.41至1.44; P = .4)。脑脊液并没有增加2至4级急性GVHD(RR,1.03; 95%CI,0.81至1.31; P = .8)或与治疗相关的死亡率(RR,1.00; 95%CI,0.78至1.29; P = 0.98) )。结论:脑脊液与记录的感染风险有小幅降低,但不影响感染或与治疗相关的死亡率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号