...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Evaluating overall survival and competing risks of death in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma using a comprehensive nomogram.
【24h】

Evaluating overall survival and competing risks of death in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma using a comprehensive nomogram.

机译:使用综合列线图评估局部肾细胞癌患者的总体生存率和死亡竞争风险。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: Many patients with localized node-negative renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are elderly with competing comorbidities. Their overall survival benefit after surgical treatment is unknown. We reviewed cases in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to evaluate the impact of kidney cancer versus competing causes of death in patients with localized RCC and develop a comprehensive nomogram to quantitate survival differences. METHODS: We identified individuals with localized, surgically treated clear-cell, papillary, or chromophobe RCC in SEER (1988 through 2003). We used Fine and Gray competing risks proportional hazards regressions to predict 5-year probabilities of three competing mortality outcomes: kidney cancer death, other cancer death, and noncancer death. RESULTS: We identified 30,801 cases of localized RCC (median age, 62 years; median tumor size, 4.5 cm). Five-year probabilities of kidney cancer death, other cancer death, and noncancer death were 4%, 7%, and 11%, respectively. Age was strongly predictive of mortality and most predictive of nonkidney cancer deaths (P < .001). Increasing tumor size was related to death from RCC and inversely related to noncancer deaths (P < .001). Racial differences in outcomes were most pronounced for nonkidney cancer deaths (P < .001). Men were more likely to die than women from all causes (P < .002). This nomogram integrates commonly available factors into a useful tool for comparing competing risks of death. CONCLUSION: Management of localized RCC must consider competing causes of mortality, particularly in elderly populations. Effective decision making requires treatment trade-off calculations. We present a tool to quantitate competing causes of mortality in patients with localized RCC.
机译:目的:许多局部淋巴结阴性的肾细胞癌(RCC)患者年龄较大,患有合并症。手术治疗后它们的总体生存益处尚不清楚。我们审查了监测,流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中的病例,以评估肾癌与局部RCC患者的竞争性死亡原因之间的关系,并开发出综合列线图以量化生存差异。方法:我们确定了SEER(1988年至2003年)患有局部,手术治疗的透明细胞,乳头状或生色性RCC的个体。我们使用Fine和Gray竞争风险比例风险回归来预测三种竞争性死亡结果的5年概率:肾癌死亡,其他癌症死亡和非癌性死亡。结果:我们确定了30,801例局部RCC病例(中位年龄62岁;中位肿瘤大小4.5 cm)。肾癌死亡,其他癌症死亡和非癌症死亡的五年概率分别为4%,7%和11%。年龄强烈预测死亡率,而最预测非肾脏癌死亡(P <.001)。肿瘤大小的增加与RCC的死亡有关,而与非癌的死亡则成反比(P <.001)。非肾脏癌死亡者的结局种族差异最为明显(P <.001)。在所有方面,男人比女人死的可能性更高(P <.002)。该列线图将常用因素整合到一个有用的工具中,以比较死亡的竞争风险。结论:局部RCC的管理必须考虑死亡率的竞争原因,尤其是在老年人口中。有效的决策需要对治疗进行权衡计算。我们提出了一种量化局部RCC患者死亡的竞争原因的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号