...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Phase II/III Study of Doxorubicin With Fluorouracil Compared With Streptozocin With Fluorouracil or Dacarbazine in the Treatment of Advanced Carcinoid Tumors: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E1281.
【24h】

Phase II/III Study of Doxorubicin With Fluorouracil Compared With Streptozocin With Fluorouracil or Dacarbazine in the Treatment of Advanced Carcinoid Tumors: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E1281.

机译:阿霉素联合氟尿嘧啶与链脲佐菌素氟尿嘧啶或达卡巴嗪的II / III期治疗晚期类癌的研究:东部合作肿瘤小组研究E1281。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE Optimal treatments for metastatic carcinoid tumor remain undefined, and the role of chemotherapy for symptomatic patients with progressive disease is uncertain. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two hundred forty-nine patients with advanced carcinoid tumors were randomized to either doxorubicin with fluorouracil (FU/DOX) or streptozocin with fluorouracil (FU/STZ). Patients crossed over to the dacarbazine (DTIC) treatment after disease progression following first-line treatment (either FU/DOX or FU/STZ), and 73 patients were assigned to one of these three treatments based on their previous treatment or on abnormal baseline cardiac or renal function. Results In the randomized group, there was no difference between FU/DOX and FU/STZ in response rates (15.9% v 16%) and progression-free survival (4.5 v 5.3 months). FU/STZ (24.3 months) was superior to FU/DOX (15.7 months; P = .0267) in median survival. The response rate of crossover DTIC treatment was 8.2%, with a median survival of 11.9 months. Hematologic toxicities were the major treatment-related toxicities for both FU/DOX and FU/STZ, and mild to moderate renal toxicity was reported in 40 (34.8%) of 115 patients in the FU/STZ arm. CONCLUSION Response to all three treatment regimens were modest. FU/STZ improved survival compared with the doxorubicin-based regimen, suggesting that the combination should be considered to be an active regimen of therapy when chemotherapy is judged to be an option for selected patients with carcinoid tumors.
机译:目的尚未确定转移性类癌的最佳治疗方法,并且对有症状的进行性疾病患者化疗的作用尚不确定。患者和方法将249例晚期类癌患者随机分为含氟尿嘧啶的阿霉素(FU / DOX)或含氟尿嘧啶的链脲霉素(FU / STZ)患者。一线治疗(FU / DOX或FU / STZ)后疾病进展后,患者转用达卡巴嗪(DTIC)治疗,根据之前的治疗或基线基线异常,将73名患者分配为这三种治疗中的一种或肾功能。结果在随机分组中,FU / DOX和FU / STZ的缓解率(15.9%vs 16%)和无进展生存期(4.5 vs 5.3个月)没有差异。 FU / STZ(24.3个月)的中位生存期优于FU / DOX(15.7个月; P = .0267)。交叉DTIC治疗的缓解率为8.2%,中位生存期为11.9个月。血液学毒性是FU / DOX和FU / STZ的主要治疗相关毒性,在FU / STZ组115例患者中,有40例(34.8%)报道了轻度至中度肾毒性。结论对所有三种治疗方案的反应均中等。与基于阿霉素的治疗方案相比,FU / STZ改善了生存率,这表明当认为化疗是某些类癌患者的选择方案时,该组合应被视为一种积极的治疗方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号