...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical nursing >The motivation of health professionals to explore research evidence in their practice: An intervention study.
【24h】

The motivation of health professionals to explore research evidence in their practice: An intervention study.

机译:卫生专业人员在实践中探索研究证据的动机:一项干预研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

AIM: To assess the impact of multifaceted clinically focused educational strategies that concentrated on introducing dementia care research evidence on health professionals' awareness and inclination to use research findings in their future practice. BACKGROUND: The promise of evidence-based practice is slow to materialize with the limitations of adopting research findings in practice readily identifiable. METHOD: A pre- and post-test quasi experimental design. The study involved the administration of: a pretest (baseline), an intervention phase, and a post-test survey, the same research utilization survey. TOOL: The Edmonton Research Orientation Survey (EROS), a self-report tool that asks participants about their attitudes toward research and about their potential to use research findings, was used to determine health professionals' orientation to research. INTERVENTION: The introduction of dementia care research evidence through multifaceted clinically focused educational strategies to improve practice. This was achieved through a resource team comprising a Clinical Nurse Consultant, as a leader and resource of localized evidence-based knowledge in aged care; an experienced Registered Nurse to support the introduction of strategies and a further experienced educator and clinician to reinforce the importance of evidence in change. RESULTS: Across all the four subscales that are measured in the Edmonton Research Orientation Survey, statistical analysis by independent samples t-test identified that there was no significant change between the before and after measurements. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Successful integration of changes based on evidence does not necessarily mean that staff become more aware or are more inclined to use research findings in future to address problems.
机译:目的:评估针对临床的多方面教育策略的影响,这些策略集中于介绍痴呆症护理研究证据,以了解卫生专业人员的意识和倾向,以便在未来的实践中使用研究结果。背景:以证据为基础的实践的希望很难兑现,而在实践中容易确定采用研究结果的局限性。方法:测试前和测试后的准实验设计。该研究涉及以下各项的管理:前测(基线),干预阶段和后测调查,相同的研究利用调查。工具:埃德蒙顿研究方向调查(EROS)是一种自我报告工具,用于向参与者询问他们对研究的态度以及他们使用研究结果的潜力,用于确定卫生专业人员的研究方向。干预:通过多方面的以临床为重点的教育策略来改善痴呆症,从而引入痴呆症护理研究证据。这是通过由临床护士顾问组成的资源团队实现的,该资源团队是老年护理的本地化循证知识的领导者和资源。一位经验丰富的注册护士来支持策略的引入,以及一位经验丰富的教育工作者和临床医生来强调证据在变革中的重要性。结果:在埃德蒙顿研究方向调查中测量的所有四个子量表中,通过独立样本t检验进行的统计分析表明,测量前后之间没有显着变化。与临床实践的关系:基于证据的成功变更整合并不一定意味着员工会变得更加了解或更倾向于将来使用研究结果来解决问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号