首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >The impact of a small-group educational intervention for allied health professionals to enhance evidence-based practice: mixed methods evaluation
【24h】

The impact of a small-group educational intervention for allied health professionals to enhance evidence-based practice: mixed methods evaluation

机译:小规模教育干预对专职卫生专业人员增强循证实践的影响:混合方法评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Healthcare professionals are recommended to use evidence-based practice (EBP) principles to update and improve clinical practice. Well-designed educational initiatives, together with practice and feedback opportunities can improve individuals’ EBP knowledge, skills and attitudes. A concurrent mixed methods assessment was designed to evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of four monthly workshops on allied health professionals’ knowledge, skills, self-efficacy and behaviour. In between workshops, professionals were encouraged to practice and integrate EBP learnings with colleagues in their workplace. Participants completed three pre and post intervention assessments: Evidence-based Practice Confidence Scale; adapted Fresno test; and an adapted EBP Implementation Scale. A purpose designed satisfaction questionnaire was completed immediately after the educational intervention and follow up focus groups were conducted after 3?months. Mean change in assessment data was quantitatively assessed and comments from the clinician satisfaction questionnaire and focus groups were thematically analysed and interpreted together with quantitative data using the Classification Rubric for EBP Assessment tools in Education (CREATE). Sixteen allied health professionals participated in the EBP workshops and completed all baseline and post intervention assessments. Seven clinicians participated in follow up focus groups. All clinicians reported a positive reaction to the learning experience, preferring short monthly workshops to a full day session. They self-reported improvements in self-efficacy (mean change 15 p??0.001) and implementing EBP behaviours (mean change 7, p??0.001) from pre- to post-intervention. Although the positive change in EBP knowledge measured by the adapted Fresno test was not statistically significant (mean change 10, p?=?0.21), clinicians described examples of improved knowledge and skills across all five key steps of EBP during the focus groups. A further, post hoc analysis of individual questions in the two self-reported scales indicated consistent improvement across key EBP knowledge and skills. A tailored small group EBP education intervention can enhance AHPs’ self-efficacy to develop answerable questions, search the literature, critically appraise, apply and evaluate research evidence. Through practicing these behaviours and sharing new learning with their peers, allied health professionals can enhance their capability and motivation to use research evidence to potentially improve clinical practice.
机译:建议医疗保健专业人员使用循证实践(EBP)原则来更新和改进临床实践。精心设计的教育计划以及实践和反馈机会可以提高个人的EBP知识,技能和态度。同时进行了混合方法评估,以评估四个月一次的有关联合卫生专业人员的知识,技能,自我效能和行为的讲习班的有效性和可行性。在研讨会之间,鼓励专业人士与他们的工作场所的同事们练习和整合EBP学习。参与者完成了三项干预前后的评估:循证实践信心量表;适应性的弗雷斯诺检验;以及经过调整的EBP实施量表。在教育干预后立即完成了有目的性的满意度调查表,并在3个月后进行了跟踪焦点小组调查。使用教育中EBP评估工具分类法(CREATE)对评估数据的平均变化进行定量评估,并对临床医生满意度调查表和焦点小组的意见进行定量分析,并与定量数据一起进行解释。 16名专职医疗专业人员参加了EBP研讨会,并完成了所有基线和干预后评估。七名临床医生参加了随访重点小组。所有临床医生都对学习经历表示了积极的反应,宁愿每月举行简短的研讨会而不是一整天的讲座。他们自我报告了干预前到干预后自我效能的改善(平均变化15 p <0.001)和实施EBP行为(平均变化7,p <0.001)。尽管通过适应性Fresno检验测得的EBP知识的积极变化在统计学上不显着(平均变化10,p = 0.21),但临床医生在焦点小组中描述了EBP的所有五个关键步骤中知识和技能提高的示例。在两个自我报告的量表中对个别问题进行的进一步事后分析表明,在关键的EBP知识和技能方面不断取得进步。量身定制的小组EBP教育干预措施可以增强AHP的自我效能,以开发可回答的问题,搜索文献,进行批判性评估,应用和评估研究证据。通过实践这些行为并与同龄人分享新的经验,专职卫生专业人员可以提高他们使用研究证据来改善临床实践的能力和动力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号