首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical nursing >Health outcomes and quality of life of residents of shared-housing arrangements compared to residents of special care units - results of the Berlin DeWeGE-study
【24h】

Health outcomes and quality of life of residents of shared-housing arrangements compared to residents of special care units - results of the Berlin DeWeGE-study

机译:与特殊护理单位居民相比,共享住房安排居民的健康结果和生活质量-柏林DeWeGE研究的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aims and objectives: To compare different health outcomes as well as quality of life (QoL) between people with dementia living in shared-housing arrangements (SHA) and special care units (SCU) in nursing homes. Background: Often situated in large apartments in mostly urban settings, SHA are a specific German kind of small-scale living facilities for older care-dependent persons, predominantly suffering from dementia. SHA are completely disconnected from traditional nursing homes. Design: In a longitudinal design, all new residents of SHA and SCU suffering with dementia in Berlin were surveyed for one year. They were assessed when they moved into the SHA or SCU and again 6 and 12 months later. Methods: We surveyed physical and psychological health outcomes including ADL-functioning (Barthel), neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia (NPI) and challenging behaviour (Cohen-Mansfield agitation inventory) as well as QoL (Qualidem). Results: Fifty-six persons (43 women, 13 men) were recruited into the longitudinal study. The average age was 82·5 years at admission, participants mostly had a moderate level of cognitive impairment (mean Mini Mental State Examination = 13·3), prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms was high. During the one-year follow-up, analyses show a significant decrease in cognitive abilities but also of neuropsychiatric symptoms in both groups. In SHA, QoL increases on average during the one-year study period. Conclusions: Both types of facilities attract slightly different populations according to our data. Comparison of SHA residents to SCU residents documented no significant beneficial effects of settings in terms of health outcomes. Relevance to clinical practice: As no clear advantage of either SHA or SCU in nursing homes can be demonstrated for residents with dementia who move in newly, it is impossible to give a clear evidence-based recommendation and the decision for one setting or the other can be made according solely to personal preference of the resident.
机译:目的和目标:比较住在共享住房安排(SHA)中的老年痴呆症患者和疗养院中的特殊护理部门(SCU)之间不同的健康结果以及生活质量(QoL)。背景:SHA通常位于大型公寓中,大部分位于城市环境中,是德国一种特殊的小规模生活设施,主要用于老年痴呆症患者。 SHA与传统的疗养院完全断开。设计:在纵向设计中,对柏林所有SHA和SCU患有痴呆症的新居民进行了为期一年的调查。当他们进入SHA或SCU并在6和12个月后再次接受评估时。方法:我们调查了身体和心理健康状况,包括ADL功能(Barthel),痴呆症的神经精神症状(NPI)和挑战性行为(Cohen-Mansfield躁动量表)以及QoL(Qualidem)。结果:纳入纵向研究的56人(43名女性,13名男性)。入院时的平均年龄为82·5岁,参与者大多具有中等程度的认知障碍(平均迷你精神状态检查= 13·3),神经精神症状的患病率很高。在为期一年的随访中,分析显示两组的认知能力以及神经精神症状均明显下降。在SHA,一年学习期间的QoL平均增加。结论:根据我们的数据,两种类型的设施吸引的人口略有不同。 SHA居民与SCU居民的比较表明,就健康结果而言,设置没有显着的有益效果。与临床实践的相关性:由于尚不能证明SHA或SCU在新进养老院中的明显优势,因此无法给出明确的循证医学推荐,而决定采用哪种设置可以仅根据居民的个人喜好来制作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号