首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical sleep medicine: JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine >Effect of continuous positive airway pressure treatment on blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Effect of continuous positive airway pressure treatment on blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

机译:持续气道正压通气治疗对血压的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Study Objectives: We sought to provide an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigating the effect of positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP). Methods: Two independent investigators undertook a systematic search of the PubMed database (1980-2012) to identify randomized controlled trials comparing therapeutic PAP to sham-PAP, pill placebo, or standard care over at least one week in adult OSA patients without major comorbidities. The mean, variance, and sample size for diurnal and nocturnal SBP and DBP data were also extracted independently from each study. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted, followed by pre-specifi ed subgroup and meta-regression analyses. Results: 32 studies were identifi ed, with data available from 28 studies representing n = 1,948 patients. The weighted mean difference in diurnal SBP (-2.58 mm Hg, 95% CI -3.57 to -1.59 mm Hg) and DBP (-2.01 mm Hg, 95% CI -2.84 to -1.18 mm Hg) both signifi cantly favored PAP treatment over control arms, with similar results seen in nocturnal readings. Statistically signifi cant reductions in BP were seen in studies whose patients were younger, sleepier, had more severe OSA, and exhibited greater PAP adherence. Meta-regression indicated that the reductions in DBP with PAP were predicted by mean baseline BP (β = -0.22, p = 0.02) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores (β = -0.27, p = 0.04). Conclusions: PAP treatment for OSA is associated with modest but signifi cant reductions in diurnal and nocturnal SBP and DBP. Future research should be directed towards identifying subgroups likely to reap greater treatment benefi ts as well as other therapeutic benefi ts provided by PAP therapy.
机译:研究目标:我们寻求提供更新的系统综述和荟萃分析,以研究阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的气道正压(PAP)治疗对收缩压和舒张压(SBP,DBP)的影响。方法:两名独立的研究人员对PubMed数据库(1980-2012年)进行了系统搜索,以鉴定在没有严重合并症的成年OSA患者中,在至少一周内比较治疗性PAP与假PAP,安慰剂或标准治疗的随机对照试验。每日和夜间SBP和DBP数据的均值,方差和样本量也从每项研究中独立提取。进行随机效应荟萃分析,然后进行预先指定的亚组和荟萃回归分析。结果:鉴定出32项研究,从28项研究中获得的数据代表n = 1,948例患者。昼夜SBP(-2.58 mm Hg,95%CI -3.57至-1.59 mm Hg)和DBP(-2.01 mm Hg,95%CI -2.84至-1.18 mm Hg)的加权均值均明显优于PAP治疗控制臂,在夜间读数中看到类似的结果。在年龄更年轻,更困,OSA更为严重且PAP依从性更高的研究中,BP的统计学意义明显降低。荟萃回归表明,PAP可使DBP减少通过平均基线BP(β= -0.22,p = 0.02)和Epworth Sleepiness Scale分数(β= -0.27,p = 0.04)预测。结论:OSA的PAP治疗与每日和夜间SBP和DBP的适度但显着降低有关。未来的研究应针对确定可能获得更大治疗益处以及PAP治疗提供的其他治疗益处的亚组。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号