...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical virology: The official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology >Brush-based self-sampling in combination with GP5+/6+-PCR-based hrHPV testing: High concordance with physician-taken cervical scrapes for HPV genotyping and detection of high-grade CIN
【24h】

Brush-based self-sampling in combination with GP5+/6+-PCR-based hrHPV testing: High concordance with physician-taken cervical scrapes for HPV genotyping and detection of high-grade CIN

机译:基于笔刷的自采样与基于GP5 + / 6 + -PCR的hrHPV检测相结合:与医生采集的宫颈刮片进行HPV基因分型和检测高等级CIN高度一致

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Studies have shown that self-sampling for hrHPV testing (HPV self-sampling) is highly acceptable to women, increases screening participation rate, and may therefore further reduce cervical cancer incidence. However, it is important to clinically validate HPV self-sampling procedures for screening purposes. Objectives: Clinical validation of combined brush-based self-sampling with GP5+/6+-PCR EIA for primary cervical screening. In addition, HPV type-specific agreement between sample types and acceptability of brush-based self-sampling were evaluated. Study design: 135 women referred for colposcopy took a self-sample at home prior to vaginal- and cervical sampling by a gynaecologist. All women were biopsied for histology. HPV testing was done by GP5+/6+-PCR EIA, with genotyping by reverse line blotting (RLB). Acceptability of sampling methods was measured with a questionnaire. Results: In this outpatient population, hrHPV test results showed good concordance between self-samples and physician-taken cervical scrapes (86%, k= 0.70), with sensitivities and specificities for CIN2+ that did not differ significantly (93% and 51%, 91% and 51%, respectively (P= 1.0)). The clinical sensitivity of brush-based self-sampling combined with GP5+/6+-PCR EIA hrHPV testing for detection of CIN2+ was non-inferior to that of hrHPV testing on physician-taken cervical samples (P= 0.018). In addition, hrHPV genotyping results were highly concordant between sample types, with almost perfect agreement for HPV16 (k= 0.81) and HPV18 (k= 0.92). Finally, 91% of participants described brush-based self-sampling as easy-to-use. Conclusions: Brush-based self-sampling in combination with GP5+/6+-PCR EIA hrHPV testing is acceptable to women and valid for assessing the risk of CIN2+ in comparison to hrHPV testing on physician-taken scrapes. In addition, there was high concordance of HPV genotyping results. Therefore, this HPV self-sampling procedure may be considered for use in routine cervical screening.
机译:背景:研究表明,hrHPV检测的自我抽样(HPV自我抽样)非常受女性接受,可提高筛查参与率,因此可进一步降低子宫颈癌的发病率。但是,对于筛查目的,临床上验证HPV自采样程序很重要。目的:结合基于笔刷的自我采样与GP5 + / 6 + -PCR EIA进行临床筛查的临床验证。此外,还评估了样本类型与基于画笔的自采样的可接受性之间的HPV类型特定一致性。研究设计:135名接受阴道镜检查的妇女在由妇科医生进行阴道和宫颈取样之前在家进行了自我取样。所有妇女均进行了组织学活检。 HPV测试通过GP5 + / 6 + -PCR EIA进行,并通过反向线印迹(RLB)进行基因分型。用问卷调查抽样方法的可接受性。结果:在该门诊人群中,hrHPV测试结果显示自我样本与医生采集的宫颈刮擦之间的一致性良好(86%,k = 0.70),对CIN2 +的敏感性和特异性没有显着差异(93%和51%,分别为91%和51%(P = 1.0)。基于笔刷的自采样结合GP5 + / 6 + -PCR EIA hrHPV检测对CIN2 +的检测的临床敏感性不亚于hrHPV检测对医生采集的宫颈样品的敏感性(P = 0.018)。此外,hrHPV基因分型结果在样品类型之间高度一致,对于HPV16(k = 0.81)和HPV18(k = 0.92)几乎完全一致。最后,有91%的参与者将基于画笔的自采样描述为易于使用。结论:基于画笔的自采样结合GP5 + / 6 + -PCR EIA hrHPV检测对于女性是可接受的,并且与医师对刮擦进行的hrHPV检测相比,有效评估了CIN2 +的风险。此外,HPV基因分型结果高度一致。因此,可以考虑将该HPV自采样程序用于常规宫颈筛查。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号