首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology >Nonword reading and Stroop interference: What differentiates attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and reading disability?
【24h】

Nonword reading and Stroop interference: What differentiates attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and reading disability?

机译:非单词阅读和Stroop干扰:导致注意力缺陷/多动障碍和阅读障碍的区别是什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Attention deficits and impaired reading performance co-occur more often than expected by chance; however, the underlying mechanism of this association still remains rather unexplored. Method: In two consecutive studies, children aged 8 to 12 years with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and children with reading disability (RD) were examined using a 2 (ADHD versus no ADHD) × 2 (RD versus no RD) factorial design. To further delineate deficient interference control from reading processes, we used a newly developed self-paced wordonword reading task (Experiment 1, n = 68) and a modified computerized Stroop paradigm, including an orthographic phonological neighbor (OPN) condition (Experiment 2, n = 84). Results: RD (compared to non-RD groups) was associated with impairments in both word and nonword reading, while children with ADHD also showed impaired nonword reading. In the Stroop task, RD, but not ADHD, had a significant impact on task performance. Interestingly, a significant interaction between ADHD, RD, and task condition emerged, which was due to particularly slower reaction times to nonwords in children with RD only, while task performance in children with comorbid ADHD and RD resembled that of ADHD only. Conclusions: Thus, our results demonstrate that impairments in nonword reading were not specific to RD but were also present in children with ADHD. In addition, RD and not ADHD was characterized by poor interference control in the Stroop task. These findings question whether unique cognitive deficits are specific to either ADHD or RD.
机译:背景:注意力缺陷和阅读能力受损的发生率比偶然预期的高。但是,这种关联的基本机制仍未得到充分探索。方法:在连续的两项研究中,使用2(ADHD对比无ADHD)×2(RD对比无RD)检查了8-12岁患有注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的儿童和阅读障碍(RD)的儿童。析因设计。为了进一步从阅读过程中描述不足的干扰控制,我们使用了新开发的自定进度的单词/非单词阅读任务(实验1,n = 68)和经过修改的计算机Stroop范例,其中包括正交拼音语音邻居(OPN)条件(实验2) ,n = 84)。结果:RD(与非RD组相比)与单词和非单词阅读能力均受损,而患有ADHD的儿童的单词阅读能力也受损。在Stroop任务中,RD(而非ADHD)对任务性能产生了重大影响。有趣的是,ADHD,RD和任务状态之间出现了显着的相互作用,这是由于仅RD儿童对非单词的反应时间特别慢,而ADHD和RD合并症儿童的任务表现仅与ADHD相似。结论:因此,我们的结果表明,非单词阅读障碍并非特定于RD,但也存在于ADHD儿童中。此外,在Stroop任务中,RD(而非ADHD)的干扰控制很差。这些发现质疑独特的认知缺陷是否特定于ADHD或RD。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号