...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical psychopharmacology >Aripiprazole, ziprasidone, and quetiapine in the treatment of first-episode nonaffective psychosis: Results of a 6-week, randomized, flexible-dose, open-label comparison
【24h】

Aripiprazole, ziprasidone, and quetiapine in the treatment of first-episode nonaffective psychosis: Results of a 6-week, randomized, flexible-dose, open-label comparison

机译:阿立哌唑,齐拉西酮和喹硫平在首发非情感性精神病的治疗中:6周,随机,可调剂量,开放标签比较的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Differences among antipsychotics in effectiveness have turned out to be a topic of increasing research interest, although comparisons between the different second-generation antipsychotics are scarce. From October 2005 to March 2011, a prospective, randomized, open-label study comparing the effectiveness of aripiprazole, ziprasidone, and quetiapine in the short-term treatment of first-episode schizophrenia-spectrum disorders was undertaken. Two hundred two patients were randomly assigned to aripiprazole (n = 78), ziprasidone (n = 62), or quetiapine (n = 62) and followed up for 6 weeks. The primary effectiveness measure was all-cause of treatment discontinuation. In addition, an analysis based on per protocol populations was conducted in the analysis for clinical efficacy. The overall dropout rate at 6 weeks was small (6.4%). The treatment discontinuation rate differed significantly between treatment groups (aripiprazole, 15%; ziprasidone, 19%; and quetiapine, 35%; ?? = 8.529; P = 0.014). Insufficient efficacy in the group of quetiapine is the main reason for discontinuation rate differences (?? = 10.139; P = 0.006). The mean time to all-cause discontinuation was significantly different between the groups (log-rank, 12.783; P = 0.001). Quetiapine was associated with a greater depressive symptoms improvement than ziprasidone (P = 0.045). The rate of responders at 6 weeks differed between the groups (F = 6, 116; P = 0.047), with a higher rate of the responders with aripiprazole. The profile of adverse effects varies between the treatments. Patients on quetiapine were less likely to be prescribed concomitant medications. Treatment with quetiapine was associated with a higher risk of treatment discontinuation during treatment owing to insufficient efficacy. Differences in effectiveness between second-generation antipsychotics would determine their position in everyday clinical practice and could help physicians choose the more efficacious antipsychotics. ? 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
机译:尽管缺乏第二代抗精神病药之间的比较,但抗精神病药之间在有效性上的差异已成为越来越多的研究兴趣。从2005年10月到2011年3月,进行了一项前瞻性,随机,开放标签的研究,比较了阿立哌唑,齐拉西酮和喹硫平在首发精神分裂症-频谱疾病的短期治疗中的有效性。 222例患者被随机分配到阿立哌唑(n = 78),齐拉西酮(n = 62)或喹硫平(n = 62)中,并随访6周。主要的有效性衡量指标是终止治疗的所有原因。另外,在临床疗效分析中进行了基于每个方案人群的分析。 6周时的总辍学率很小(6.4%)。各治疗组之间的治疗终止率差异显着(阿立哌唑为15%;齐拉西酮为19%;喹硫平为35%;Δε= 8.529; P = 0.014)。喹硫平组中功效不足是中断率差异的主要原因(Δε= 10.139; P = 0.006)。两组之间因所有原因停药的平均时间显着不同(对数秩为12.783; P = 0.001)。喹硫平比齐拉西酮具有更大的抑郁症状改善(P = 0.045)。两组之间在6周时的缓解率有所不同(F = 6,116; P = 0.047),其中阿立哌唑的缓解率更高。不良反应的情况因治疗而异。接受喹硫平治疗的患者较少接受处方药。由于功效不足,喹硫平治疗与治疗期间中止治疗的较高风险相关。第二代抗精神病药之间功效的差异将决定其在日常临床实践中的地位,并可以帮助医生选择更有效的抗精神病药。 ? 2013年Lippincott Williams&Wilkins。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号